Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Microstructural Evolution of Silver Nanowires upon Their Polyol Formation

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X24080122-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24080122
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
N.P. Simonenko
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 8
Pages
1201-1210
Abstract
The microstructure evolution of silver nanowires during their formation by the polyol method at 170°C has been studied. UV-Vis spectrophotometry shows significant changes in the shape of the absorption band associated with the surface plasmon resonance of the resulting silver nanostructures. The X-ray diffraction analysis data indicate that all the obtained nanostructures have face-centered cubic lattice of silver. The effect of heat treatment duration on the I(111)/I(200) ratio was studied. The use of scanning electron microscopy revealed the influence of synthesis conditions on the microstructural features of the particles formed. In particular, after 45 min from the beginning of polyol synthesis a material characterized by an increased concentration of longer nanowires (up to 25 μm in length) is formed, and in individual cases one-dimensional structures up to 70 μm in length are found. The nanowires obtained are characterized by a remarkably low value of diameter (35–40 nm). The time when the process of silver nanowires destruction is intensified and the concentration of micro-rods and zero-dimensional particles increases has also been determined. It is assumed that individual nanowires in the course of heat treatment of the reaction system are connected by side faces, which leads to their recrystallization leading to the appearance of one-dimensional structures with a larger diameter and their subsequent degradation due to emerging defects.
Keywords
полиольный синтез серебряные нанопроволоки одномерные наноструктуры поверхностный плазмонный резонанс дисперсные системы прозрачные электроды
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Guo C.F., Ren Z. // Mater. Today. 2015. V. 18. № 3. P. 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.08.018
  2. 2. Kim J., da Silva W.J., bin Mohd Yusoff A.R. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 6. № 1. P. 19813. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19813
  3. 3. Yang C., Gu H., Lin W. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2011. V. 23. № 27. P. 3052. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201100530
  4. 4. Zeng L., Zhao T.S., An L. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015. V. 3. № 4. P. 1410. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA05005C
  5. 5. Du H., Pan Y., Zhang X. et al. // Nanoscale Adv. 2019. V. 1. № 1. P. 140. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NA00110C
  6. 6. Du B., Shen C., Wang T. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2023. V. 439. P. 141690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141690
  7. 7. Xie C., Xiao C., Fang J. et al. // Nano Energy. 2023. V. 107. P. 108153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108153
  8. 8. Huš M., Hellman A. // ACS Catal. 2019. V. 9. № 2. P. 1183. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b04512
  9. 9. Liu Q., Zhang X.-G., Du Z.-Y. et al. // Sci. China Chem. 2023. V. 66. № 1. P. 259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-022-1460-7
  10. 10. Nair A.K., Thazhe veettil V., Kalarikkal N. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 6. № 1. P. 37731. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37731
  11. 11. Zhang Q., Jiang D., Xu C. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2020. V. 320. P. 128325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.128325
  12. 12. Chu S., Nakkeeran K., Abobaker A.M. et al. // IEEE Sens. J. 2021. V. 21. № 1. P. 76. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2981897
  13. 13. Hao T., Wang S., Xu H. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2021. V. 426. P. 130840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130840
  14. 14. Pan X.-T., Liu Y.-Y., Qian S.-Q. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021. V. 13. № 16. P. 19023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c02332
  15. 15. Simonenko N.P., Musaev A.G., Simonenko T.L. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 12. № 1. P. 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010136
  16. 16. Lee D.J., Oh Y., Hong J.-M. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 8. № 1. P. 14170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32590-0
  17. 17. Wang Y.H., Xiong N.N., Li Z.L. et al. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2015. V. 26. № 10. P. 7927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-3446-9
  18. 18. Jeong J.-M., Sohn M., Bang J. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2023. V. 13. № 1. P. 14354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41646-9
  19. 19. Ha H., Amicucci C., Matteini P. et al. // Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2022. V. 50. P. 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2022.100663
  20. 20. Xiao N., Chen Y., Weng W. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. № 15. P. 2681. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152681
  21. 21. Liao Q., Hou W., Zhang J. et al. // Coatings. 2022. V. 12. № 11. P. 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111756
  22. 22. Jo H.-A., Jang H.-W., Hwang B.-Y. et al. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. № 106. P. 104273. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA21349A
  23. 23. da Silva R.R., Yang M., Choi S.-I. et al. // ACS Nano. 2016. V. 10. № 8. P. 7892. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b03806
  24. 24. Coskun S., Aksoy B., Unalan H.E. // Cryst. Growth Des. 2011. V. 11. № 11. P. 4963. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg200874g
  25. 25. Jiu J., Araki T., Wang J. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014. V. 2. № 18. P. 6326. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA00502C
  26. 26. Fahad S., Yu H., Wang L. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2019. V. 54. № 2. P. 997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2994-9
  27. 27. Zhang P., Wyman I., Hu J. et al. // Mater. Sci. Eng., B. 2017. V. 223. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2017.05.002
  28. 28. Sun Y., Xia Y. // Adv. Mater. 2002. V. 14. № 11. P. 833. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095 (20020605) 14:113.0.CO;2-K
  29. 29. Sun Y., Yin Y., Mayers B.T. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2002. V. 14. № 11. P. 4736. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm020587b
  30. 30. Sun Y., Gates B., Mayers B. et al. // Nano Lett. 2002. V. 2. № 2. P. 165. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl010093y
  31. 31. Lu J., Liu D., Dai J. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2019. V. 30. № 16. P. 15786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01964-z
  32. 32. Bergin S.M., Chen Y.-H., Rathmell A.R. et al. // Nanoscale. 2012. V. 4. № 6. P. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr30126a
  33. 33. Ashkarran A.A., Derakhshi M. // J. Clust. Sci. 2015. V. 26. № 5. P. 1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-015-0887-5
  34. 34. Gebeyehu M.B., Chala T.F., Chang S.-Y. et al. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 26. P. 16139. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA00238F
  35. 35. Ma J., Zhan M. // RSC Adv. 2014. V. 4. № 40. P. 21060. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra00711e
  36. 36. Guo Y., Hu Y., Luo X. et al. // Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021. V. 128. P. 108558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108558
  37. 37. Lin J.-Y., Hsueh Y.-L., Huang J.-J. // J. Solid State Chem. 2014. V. 214. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2013.12.017
  38. 38. Teymouri Z., Naji L., Fakharan Z. // Org. Electron. 2018. V. 62. P. 621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2018.06.039
  39. 39. Hemmati S., Harris M.T., Barkey D.P. // J. Nanomater. 2020. V. 2020. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9341983
  40. 40. Ran Y., He W., Wang K. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2014. V. 50. № 94. P. 14877. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC04698F
  41. 41. Madeira A., Papanastasiou D.T., Toupance T. et al. // Nanoscale Adv. 2020. V. 2. № 9. P. 3804. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00392A
  42. 42. Sim H., Kim C., Bok S. et al. // Nanoscale. 2018. V. 10. № 25. P. 12087. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR02242A
  43. 43. Araki T., Jiu J., Nogi M. et al. // Nano Res. 2014. V. 7. № 2. P. 236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-013-0391-x
  44. 44. Zhang B., Dang R., Cao Q. et al. // J. Nanomater. 2019. V. 2019. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8646385
  45. 45. Ding H., Zhang Y., Yang G. et al. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. № 10. P. 8096. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA25474D
  46. 46. Li Y., Li Y., Fan Z. et al. // ACS Omega. 2020. V. 5. № 29. P. 18458. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02156
  47. 47. Bari B., Lee J., Jang T. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016. V. 4. № 29. P. 11365. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03308C
  48. 48. Yang Z., Qian H., Chen H. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010. V. 352. № 2. P. 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.072
  49. 49. Shi Y., Fang J. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2022. V. 126. № 46. P. 19866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05632
  50. 50. Lee E.-J., Chang M.-H., Kim Y.-S. et al. // APL Mater. 2013. V. 1. № 4. P. 042118. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826154
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library