Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Formation of layered biocomposite as a promising basis for metal-ceramic bone implants

You can
PII
S3034560XS0044457X25060048-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034560X25060048
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. A. Belov
  • Affiliation: Far Eastern Federal University
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 6
Pages
765-775
Abstract
The research is devoted to the development of a layered biocomposite in the form of a functional-gradient material (FGM) combining Ti-6Al-4V alloy and bioceramics based on titanium dioxide with hydroxyapatite, promising for use in metal-ceramic bone implants. The method of FGM formation overcoming the limitations of its components, such as low mechanical strength of bioceramics and lack of osteoinductivity in titanium medical alloys, is presented. In this work, a spark plasma sintering (SPS) technique was utilized to achieve a strong and unbreakable bond between the ceramic and alloy layers. The results showed that the phase composition of both materials remained stable during the heating process, and an intermediate layer of β-Ti was formed at the contact interface, which improved the mechanical strength of the joint. Microhardness tests confirmed the integrity of the composite with preservation of strength at the interface between the ceramic and alloy. The absence of defects and internal stresses at the boundaries of the formed joint testify to its high mechanical stability and demonstrate the potential of the method for possible practical application in order to create modern structurally strong implants with improved osseointegration function.
Keywords
биокерамика искровое плазменное спекание соединение сплав гидроксиапатит
Date of publication
16.06.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
56

References

  1. 1. Ranjan N., Singh R., Ahuja I. // Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. Med. 2019. V. 233. № 7. P. 754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411919852811
  2. 2. Oltean-Dan D., Dogaru G.-B., Jianu E.-M. et al. // Micromachines. 2021. V. 12. № 11. P. 1352. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111352
  3. 3. Logesh M., Ahn S.-G., Choe H.-C. // J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024. V. 33. P. 7620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.114
  4. 4. Hosseini M., Khalil-Allafi J., Safavi M.S. // J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024. V. 33. № August. P. 4055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.081
  5. 5. Nisar S.S., Arun S., Toan N.K. et al. // J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024. V. 31. № June. P. 1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.155
  6. 6. Liu Y., Wang G., Zhao Y. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022. V. 42. № 5. P. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.12.063
  7. 7. Zhou X., Han Y.H., Shen X. et al. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2015. V. 466. P. 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.004
  8. 8. Zhou X., Yang H., Chen F. et al. // Carbon N. Y. 2016. V. 102. P. 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.036
  9. 9. Zhao X., Duan L., Liu W. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 39. № 16. P. 5473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.08.013
  10. 10. Zhao X., Duan L., Wang Y. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 39. № 5. P. 1757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.020
  11. 11. Tatarko P., Grasso S., Saunders T.G. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017. V. 37. № 13. P. 3841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.05.016
  12. 12. Zhao X., Duan L., Liu W. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2019. V. 45. № 17. P. 23111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.005
  13. 13. Zhou X., Han Y.-H., Shen X. et al. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2015. V. 466. P. 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.004
  14. 14. Tatarko P., Grasso S., Saunders T.G. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017. V. 37. № 13. P. 3841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.05.016
  15. 15. Rafiei M., Eivaz Mohammadloo H., Khorasani M. et al. // Heliyon. 2025. V. 11. № 2. P. E41813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41813
  16. 16. Gabor R., Cvrček L., Causidu S. et al. // Surf. Interfaces. 2021. V. 25. № December. 2020. V. 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101209
  17. 17. Al-Kaisy H.A., Issa R.A.H., Faheed N.K. et al. // Rev. Compos. Mater. Av. 2024. V. 34. № 2. P. 125. https://doi.org/10.18280/rcma.340201
  18. 18. Ramasamy P., Sundharam S. // J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 2021. V. 57. № 2. P. 605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-021-00561-w
  19. 19. Lin Y., Balbaa M., Zeng W. et al. // J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2023. V. 33. № 18. P. 9664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08632-8
  20. 20. Asgarian R., Khalghi A., Kiani Harchegani R. et al. // Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2021. V. 127. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-04188-9
  21. 21. Rodrigues L.F., Tronco M.C., Escobar C.F. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2019. V. 45. № 12. P. 14806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.211
  22. 22. Yang W., Han Q., Chen H. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024. V. 188. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.10.061
  23. 23. Abdullah Naji F.A., Murtaza Q., Niranjan M.S. // Precis. Eng. 2024. V. 88. P. 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2024.01.019
  24. 24. Qiu J., Ding Z., Yi Y. et al. // Mater. Today Commun. 2024. V. 38. P. 108146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108146
  25. 25. Navarro M., Michiardi A., Castaño O. et al. // J. R. Soc. Interface. 2008. V. 5. № 27. P. 1137. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0151
  26. 26. Kumari R., Kumar S., Das A.K. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2024. V. 24. P. 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2024.100655
  27. 27. Pauline S.A., Karuppusamy I., Gopalsamy K. et al. // J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2024. V. 166. Part 2. № January. P. 105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2024.105576
  28. 28. Hussain M.A., Ul Haq E., Munawar I. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2022. V. 48. № 10. P. 14481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.341
  29. 29. Fu Y., Mo A. // Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018. V. 13. Art. 187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2597-z
  30. 30. Garcia-Lobato M.A., Mtz-Enriquez A.I., Garcia C.R. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019. V. 484. P. 975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.108
  31. 31. Awad N.K., Edwards S.L., Morsi Y.S. // Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017. V. 76. P. 1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.150
  32. 32. Papynov E.K., Shichalin O.O., Belov A.A. et al. // J. Funct. Biomater. 2023. V. 14. № 5. P. 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14050259
  33. 33. Papynov E., Shichalin O., Buravlev I. et al. // J. Funct. Biomater. 2020. V. 11. № 2. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb11020041
  34. 34. Apanasevich V., Papynov E., Plekhova N. et al. // J. Funct. Biomater. 2020. V. 11. № 4. P. 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/JFB11040068
  35. 35. Tecu C., Antoniac A., Goller G. et al. // Rev. Chim. 2018. V. 69. № 5. P. 1272. https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.5.6306
  36. 36. Ingole V.H., Sathe B., Ghule A.V. // Bioactive ceramic composite material stability, characterization, and bonding to bone, in: Fundam. Biomater. Ceram. Elsevier, 2018. P. 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102203-0.00012-3
  37. 37. Luginina M., Angioni D., Montinaro S. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020. V. 40. № 13. P. 4623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.05.061
  38. 38. Rastgoo M.J., Razavi M., Salahi E. et al. // Bull. Mater. Sci. 2019. V. 42. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-018-1698-8
  39. 39. Nath S., Tripathi R., Basu B. // Mater. Sci. Eng. 2009. V. 29. № 1. P. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.05.019
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library