RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

ZINC GLYCERATE AS A PRECURSOR FOR THE PREPARATION OF NANOCRYSTALLINE ZnO WITH IMPROVED NO GAS SENSITIVITY

PII
S3034560X25100183-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034560X25100183
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 10
Pages
1406-1416
Abstract
This study presents a simple and efficient method for synthesizing nanocrystalline zinc oxide using glycerate precursors. Zinc glycerates were obtained through thermal treatment of a solution of zinc acetylacetonate monohydrate in glycerol, followed by additional thermal processing, which resulted in the formation of nanocrystalline ZnO. The synthesized ZnO nanoparticles were characterized using XRD, SEM, and DTA/DSC techniques. The gas-sensing properties of ZnO toward a wide range of analyte gases were investigated. It was demonstrated that nanocrystalline ZnO exhibits high sensitivity and selectivity to NO. The proposed approach opens new prospects for the development of cost-effective and efficient gas sensors based on semiconductor oxides.
Keywords
хеморезистивный сенсор оксид цинка глицерат цинка химическая газовая сенсорика
Date of publication
01.10.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
45

References

  1. 1. Özgür Ü., Alivov Y.I., Liu C. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2005. V. 98. № 4. P. 041301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1992666
  2. 2. Look D.C.// Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 2001. V. 80. № 1–3. P. 383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107 (00)00604-8
  3. 3. Thomas D.G., Lander J.J. // J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 1957. V. 2. № 4. P. 318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697 (57)90077-X
  4. 4. Reynolds D.C., Look D.C., Jogai B. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 1999. V. 60. № 4. P. 2340. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.2340
  5. 5. Chen Y., Bagnall D.M., Koh H. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 1998. V. 84. № 7. P. 3912. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368595
  6. 6. Mang, K. Reimann, S. Ribenacke // Solid State Commun. 1995. V. 94. № 4. P. 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098 (95)00054-2
  7. 7. Janotti, C.G. Van de Walle // Rep. Prog. Phys. 2009. V. 72. № 12. P. 126501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126501
  8. 8. Wang Z.L. // J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2004. V. 16. № 25. P. R829. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/25/R01
  9. 9. Huang M.H., Mao S., Feick H. et al. // Science. 2001. V. 292. № 5523. P. 1897. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1060367
  10. 10. Arnold M.S., Avouris P., Pan Z.W., Wang Z.L. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003. V. 107. № 3. P. 659. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0271054
  11. 11. Collins P.G., Arnold M.S., Avouris P. // Science. 2001. V. 292. № 5517. P. 706. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058782
  12. 12. Schwab K., Henriksen E.A., Worlock J.M., Roukes M.L. // Nature. 2000. V. 404. № 6781. P. 974. https://doi.org/10.1038/35010065
  13. 13. Comini E., Faglia G., Shevegliert G., Pan Z., Wang Z.L. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002. V. 81. № 10. P. 1869. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1504867
  14. 14. Zhao M.-H., Wang Z.-L., Mao S.X. // Nano Lett. 2004. V. 4. № 4. P. 587. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl035198a
  15. 15. Wibowo M.A., Marsudi M.I., Amal M.I. et al. // RSC Adv. 2020. V. 10. № 69. P. 42838. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA07689A
  16. 16. Keis K., Lindgren J., Lindquist S.-E., Hagfeldt A. // Langmuir. 2000. V. 16. № 10. P. 4688. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9912702
  17. 17. Wang C., Yin L., Zhang L. et al. // Sensors. 2010. V. 10. № 3. P. 2088. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100302088
  18. 18. Korotzenkov G. // Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2008. V. 61. № 1–6. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mscr.2008.02.001
  19. 19. Lee J.-H. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2009. V. 140. № 1. P. 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.04.026
  20. 20. Aygin S., Cann D. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2005. V. 106. № 2. P. 837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2004.10.004
  21. 21. Jing Z., Zhan J. // Adv. Mater. 2008. V. 20. № 23. P. 4547. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800243
  22. 22. Rothschild Y. Komem // J. Appl. Phys. 2004. V. 95. № 11. P. 6374. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1728314
  23. 23. Yu J.H., Choi G.M. // Sens. Actuators, B. 1998. V. 52. № 3. P. 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005 (98)00275-5
  24. 24. Choi M.S., Kim M.Y., Mirzaei A. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021. V. 568. P. 150910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150910
  25. 25. Leileveld J., Klingmüller K., Pozzer A. et al. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2019. V. 116. № 15. P. 7192. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819989116
  26. 26. Brunekreef B., Holgate S.T. // Lancet. 2002. V. 360. № 9341. P. 1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (02)11274-8
  27. 27. HorennansF., Menus J., Bonggers E. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2010. V. 148. № 2. P. 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.05.003
  28. 28. Xuan J., Zhao G., Sun M. et al. // RSC Adv. 2020. V. 10. № 65. P. 39786. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA073281
  29. 29. Zhu L., Zeng W., Li Y. // Mater. Lett. 2018. V. 228. P. 331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.049
  30. 30. Ong C.B., Ng L.Y., Mohammad A.W. // Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018. V. 81. P. 536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.020
  31. 31. Sakai G., Matsunaga N., Shimanoe K., Yamazoe N. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2001. V. 80. № 2. P. 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005 (01)00890-5
  32. 32. Xia H., Xu Q., Zhang J. // Nano-Micro Lett. 2018. V. 10. № 4. P. 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0219-z
  33. 33. Liu J., Gao F., Wu L. et al. // Appl. Phys. A. 2020. V. 126. № 6. P. 454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03643-x
  34. 34. Mrabet, N. Mahdhi, A. Boukhachen, M. Amlouk, T. Manoubi // J. Alloys Compd. 2016. V. 688. P. 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.286
  35. 35. Livage J., Henry M., Sanchez C. // Prog. Solid State Chem. 1988. V. 18. № 4. P. 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6786 (88)90005-2
  36. 36. Segovia M., Sotomayor C., Gonzalez G., Benavente E. // Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2012. V. 555. № 1. P. 40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2012.634363
  37. 37. Choy K. // Prog. Mater. Sci. 2003. V. 48. № 2. P. 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425 (01)00009-3
  38. 38. Zahra S., Bukhari H., Qaisar S., Sheikh A., Amin A. // BMC Chem. 2022. V. 16. № 1. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00900-3
  39. 39. Greiner, J.H. Wendoff // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007. V. 46. № 30. P. 5670. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200604646
  40. 40. M.I. Ikin, V.F. Gromov, G.N. Gerasimov et al. // Micromachines. 2023. V. 14. № 9. P. 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14091685
  41. 41. Droepen E.K., Wee B.S., Chin S.F., Kok K.Y. // Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021. V. 12. № 1. P. 4261. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC123.42614292
  42. 42. Dien N.D. // Adv. Mater. Sci. 2019. V. 4. № 2. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.15761/AMS.1000147
  43. 43. Yukhin Y.M., Titkov A.I., Logutenko O.A., Mishchenko K.V., Lyakhov N.Z. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2017. V. 87. № 12. P. 2870. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363217120180
  44. 44. Pazyrev I.S., Andreikov E.I., Zakharova G.S., Podval’naya N.V., Osipova V.A. // Russ. Chem. Bull. 2021. V. 70. № 4. P. 805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-021-3153-z
  45. 45. Kim H.-B., Jeong D.-W., Jang D.-J. // CrystEngComm. 2016. V. 18. № 5. P. 898. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE02334C
  46. 46. Zahra S., Shahid W., Amin C.A., Zahra S., Kanwal B. // BMC Chem. 2022. V. 16. № 1. P. 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00898-8
  47. 47. Zhang P., Liu L., Fan M., Dong Y., Jiang P. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. № 80. P. 76223. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA14288E
  48. 48. Zhang S., Yang P., Zhang A., Shi R., Zhu Y. // CrystEngComm. 2013. V. 15. № 43. P. 9090. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ce41218k
  49. 49. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017. V. 62. № 11. P. 1415. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023617110195
  50. 50. Nagornov I.A., Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko E.P. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2020. V. 46. № 6. P. 7756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.279
  51. 51. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018. V. 63. № 11. P. 1519. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618110189
  52. 52. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017. V. 62. № 11. P. 1415. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023617110195
  53. 53. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018. V. 63. № 11. P. 1519. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618110189
  54. 54. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Simonenko T.L. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022. V. 589. P. 152974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152974
  55. 55. Simonenko E.P., Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 69. № 5. P. 604. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023624600850
  56. 56. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Simonenko T.L. et al. // Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 2021. V. 271. P. 115233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115233
  57. 57. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Gorban Y.M. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2023. V. 49. № 11. P. 17600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.126
  58. 58. Ji H., Zeng W., Li Y. // Nanoscale. 2019. V. 11. № 47. P. 22664. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR07699A
  59. 59. Jeong S., Kim J., Lee J. // Adv. Mater. 2020. V. 32. № 51. P. 2002075. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002075
  60. 60. Chen M., Wang Z., Han D., Gu F., Guo G. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011. V. 115. № 26. P. 12763. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp201816d
  61. 61. Marikutsa, M. Rumyantseva, E.A. Konstantinova, A. Gaskov // Sensors. 2021. V. 21. № 7. P. 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072554
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library