Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

HYDROTHERMAL SYNTHESIS OF HIERARCHICALLY ORGANIZED MoS2 AND THE FORMATION OF FILMS BASED ON IT

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X24120035-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24120035
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
T. L Simonenko
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
N. P Simonenko
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
M. V. Kozlova
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 12
Pages
1690-1704
Abstract
The influence of hydrothermal synthesis parameters on the crystal structure and morphology of MoS2 particles has been shown. The results of synchronous thermal analysis showed that at the concentration of molybdenum cations of 0.05 mol/L, the increase in the duration of hydrothermal treatment leads to a decrease in the total mass loss (Δm), and the increase in c(Mo), on the contrary, results in a significant increase in the total Δm value. The dependence of the exo-effect maximum position, related to the MoS2 oxidation with the formation of MoO3, on the synthesis conditions was determined. According to X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) data, the 1T-MoS2 phase is formed at minimum c(Mo) and duration of heat treatment. Increasing the time duration leads to the transformation of 1T-phase into 2H-MoS2. With increasing c(Mo), the 2H-phase transforms to 1T-MoS2 and further to 1T/2H-MoS2. The transformation of MoS2 structure was also analyzed by Raman spectroscopy. From the results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), all samples represent flower-like nanostructures consisting of twisted nanosheets. According to transmission electron microscopy data, individual nanosheets with a length of 50-500 nm are formed after delamination of molybdenum disulfide structures. The microstructure of the obtained MoS2 film was studied by SEM and atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the film surface by Kelvin-probe force microscopy allows to establish the material has high electrical conductivity, and the work function value of the film surface was calculated.
Keywords
гидротермальный синтез дисульфид молибдена нанолисты иерархические структуры пленки метод вращения подложки электрод суперконденсатор
Date of publication
15.12.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
54

References

  1. 1. Muhammad Saqib Q., Mannan A., Noman M. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2024. V. 490. P. 151857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.151857
  2. 2. Bu F., Zhou W., Xu Y. et al. // npj Flex. Electron. 2020. V. 4. № 1. P. 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-020-00093-6
  3. 3. Simonenko T.L., Simonenko N.P., Gorobtsov P.Y. et al. // Materials (Basel). 2023. V. 16. № 18. P. 6133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186133
  4. 4. Sun X., Chen K., Liang F. et al. // Front. Chem. 2022. V. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.807500
  5. 5. Xie Y., Zhang H., Hu H. et al. // Chem. A Eur. J. 2024. V. 30. № 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202304160
  6. 6. Khan Y., Ostfeld A.E., Lochner C.M. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2016. V. 28. № 22. P. 4373. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504366
  7. 7. Lu Y., Lou Z., Jiang K. et al. // Mater. Today Nano. 2019. V. 8. P. 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2019.100050
  8. 8. Jia R., Shen G., Qu F. et al. // Energy Storage Mater. 2020. V. 27. P. 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.01.030
  9. 9. Hepel M. // Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2023. V. 3. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsa.202100222
  10. 10. Han X., Wu X., Zhao L. et al. // Microsystems Nanoeng. 2024. V. 10. № 1. P. 107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-024-00742-0
  11. 11. Reenu, Sonia, Phor L. et al. // J. Energy Storage. 2024. V. 84. P. 110698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.110698
  12. 12. Czagany M., Hompoth S., Keshri A.K. et al. // Materials (Basel). 2024. V. 17. № 3. P. 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17030702
  13. 13. Das H.T., Dutta S., T. E.B. et al. // Handb. Biodegrad. Mater. Springer International Publishing. Cham, 2023. P. 1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09710-2_41
  14. 14. Forouzandeh P., Kumaravel V., Pillai S.C. // Catalysts. 2020. V. 10. № 9. P. 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10090969
  15. 15. Choi W., Choudhary N., Han G.H. et al. // Mater. Today. 2017. V. 20. № 3. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.002
  16. 16. Tao H., Fan Q., Ma T. et al. // Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020. V. 111. P. 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100637
  17. 17. Kumar P., Abuhimd H., Wahyudi W. et al. // ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2016. V. 5. № 11. P. Q3021. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0051611jss
  18. 18. Joseph N., Shafi P.M., Bose A.C. // Energy & Fuels. 2020. V. 34. № 6. P. 6558. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00430
  19. 19. Mohan M., Shetti N.P., Aminabhavi T.M. // Mater. Today Chem. 2023. V. 27. P. 101333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101333
  20. 20. Al-Ghiffari A.D., Ludin N.A., Davies M.L. et al. // Mater. Today Commun. 2022. V. 32. P. 104078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104078
  21. 21. Hu T., Zhang R., Li J.-P. et al. // Chip. 2022. V. 1. № 3. P. 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chip.2022.100017
  22. 22. Ji S., Bae S., Hu L. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2024. V. 36. № 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202309531
  23. 23. Yin Z., Li H., Li H. et al. // ACS Nano. 2012. V. 6. № 1. P. 74. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2024557
  24. 24. Li H., Wu J., Yin Z. et al. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2014. V. 47. № 4. P. 1067. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar4002312
  25. 25. Cantarella M., Gorrasi G., Di Mauro A. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2019. V. 9. № 1. P. 974. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37798-8
  26. 26. Simonenko T.L., Simonenko N.P., Zemlyanukhin A.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68. № 12. P. 1875. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362360212X
  27. 27. Li J., Listwan A., Liang J. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2021. V. 422. P. 130100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130100
  28. 28. Wang T., Guo J., Zhang Y. et al. // Cryst. Growth Des. 2024. V. 24. № 7. P. 2755. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.3c01369
  29. 29. Cadot S., Renault O., Fregnaux M. et al. // Nanoscale. 2017. V. 9. № 2. P. 538. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR06021H
  30. 30. Park C., Shim G.W., Hong W. et al. // ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023. V. 6. № 10. P. 8981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c01622
  31. 31. Simonenko T.L., Bocharova V.A., Simonenko N.P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020. V. 65. № 4. P. 459. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362004018X
  32. 32. Simonenko T.L., Bocharova V.A., Gorobtsov P.Y. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020. V. 65. № 9. P. 1292. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023620090193
  33. 33. Simonenko T.L., Dudorova D.A., Simonenko N.P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68. № 12. P. 1865. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023623602131
  34. 34. Han J.T., Jang J.I., Kim H. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2014. V. 4. № 1. P. 5133. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05133
  35. 35. Lukianov M.Y., Rubekina A.A., Bondareva J.V. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2023. V. 13. № 13. P. 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13131982
  36. 36. Qiu H., Zheng H., Jin Y. et al. // Ionics (Kiel). 2020. V. 26. № 11. P. 5543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-020-03734-y
  37. 37. Yan H., Song P., Zhang S. et al. // RSC Adv. 2015. V. 5. № 89. P. 72728. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA13036K
  38. 38. Wang X., Li H., Li H. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020. V. 30. № 15. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910302Reddy
  39. 39. Inta H., Biswas T., Ghosh S. et al. // ChemNanoMat. 2020. V. 6. № 4. P. 685. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.202000005
  40. 40. Zhao W., Liu X., Yang X. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2020. V. 10. № 6. P. 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061124Feng
  41. 41. J., Fan Y., Zhao H. et al. // Brazilian J. Phys. 2021. V. 51. № 3. P. 493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-021-00863-1Kaur
  42. 42. J., Gravagnuolo A.M., Maddalena P. et al. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 36. P. 22400. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01680HPierucci
  43. 43. D., Henck H., Naylor C.H. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 6. № 1. P. 26656. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26656
  44. 44. Yu H., Xu J., Liu Z. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2018. V. 53. № 21. P. 15271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2687-4
  45. 45. Shakya J., Kumar S., Kanjilal D. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2017. V. 7. № 1. P. 9576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09916-5
  46. 46. Zhou P., Song X., Yan X. et al. // Nanotechnology. 2016. V. 27. № 34. P. 344002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/34/344002
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library