Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF BaSn(OH)6 AND ITS THERMAL DESTRUCTION IN THE PROCESS OF BaSnO3 PREPARATION

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X24120014-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24120014
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
T. L Simonenko
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
M. V. Kozlova
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 12
Pages
1667-1676
Abstract
The synthesis of barium hexahydroxostannate BaSn(OH)6 and its thermal destruction leading to the barium stannate BaSnO3 have been studied. It is shown that the most intensive decomposition of BaSn(OH)6 occurs in the temperature range of 200-650℃. Crystallization of BaSnO3 proceeds in a narrow temperature range (650-675℃), and the maximum of the corresponding exo-effect is located at 667℃. It was found that at 500℃ (within 60 min) BaSn(OH)6 completely decomposes with the formation of X-ray amorphous powder. When the material is kept at 600℃ (60 min), crystallization of barium stannate BaSnO3 with perovskite structure takes place. The crystalline impurity of barium carbonate contained in the semiproduct is preserved up to 600℃, and at temperatures from 700℃ the single-phase BaSnO3 is formed. The crystallization temperature of barium stannate can be reduced by 50-75℃ due to thermal exposure of the powder for 40-60 min. Holding the semiproduct at 600℃ for 60 min forms barium stannate with an average crystallite size of 21 ± 2 nm, and at 700℃ there is a slight increase in this parameter (up to 22 ± 2 nm).With increasing temperature up to 1000℃ there is intensification of crystallite enlargement process (up to 34 ± 3 nm). The obtained BaSnO3 powder, according to scanning electron microscopy data, consists of microrods (average length is about 85 μm; average diameter is about 10 μm). The surface of the rods is partially covered with spherical particles formed from smaller primary particles of about 30 nm in size.
Keywords
жидкофазный синтез химическое осаждение гексагидроксостаннат бария станнат бария перовскит нанопорошок
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Mishra G., Minor C., Tiwari A. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023. V. 295. P. 127042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127042
  2. 2. Ochoa Munoz Y.H., Ponce M., Rodrguez Paez J.E. // Powder Technol. 2015. V. 279. P. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.049
  3. 3. Alammar T., Mudring A.-V. // Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 63. № 14. P. 6132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02874
  4. 4. Chawla S., Aggarwal G., Kumar A. et al. // ChemRxiv. 2021. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-c0500
  5. 5. Jaim H.M.I., Lee S., Zhang X. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017. V. 111. № 17. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4996548
  6. 6. Song X., Wang G., Zhou L. et al. // ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023. V. 6. № 18. P. 9756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c01870
  7. 7. Lee S., Wang H., Gopal P. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2017. V. 29. № 21. P. 9378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03381
  8. 8. Ochoa Y.H., Schipani F., Aldao C.M. et al. // J. Mater. Res. 2015. V. 30. № 22. P. 3423. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2015.318
  9. 9. Vereshchagin S.N., Dudnikov V.A., Rabchevsky E.V. et al. //Trans. Ко1а Sci. Cent. RAS. Ser. Eng. Sci. 2023. V. 3. № 3. P. 76. https://doi.org/10.37614/2949-1215.2023.14.3.013
  10. 10. Kumar U., Upadhyay S. // J. Electron. Mater. 2019. V. 48. № 8. P. 5279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07336-x
  11. 11. Akbar N., Paydar S., Afzal M. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2022. V. 47. № 8. P. 5531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.163
  12. 12. Zvonareva I.A., Starostin G.N., Akopian M.T. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2023. V. 565. P. 232883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232883
  13. 13. Kumar A.A., Singh J., Rajput D.S. et al. // Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018. V. 83. P. 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.04.023
  14. 14. Purushotham Reddy N., Santhosh R., Fernandes J.M. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2022. V. 311. P. 131629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131629
  15. 15. Geelani K.A., Alyousef H.A., Dahshan A. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024. V. 81. P. 436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.116
  16. 16. Nithyadharseni P., Reddy M.V., Ozoemena K.I. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016. V. 163. № 3. P. A540. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0961603jes
  17. 17. Cha Y.L., Kim S.H. //J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020. V. 20. № 9. P. 5498. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2020.17623
  18. 18. Bhattacharya A., Zhang Y., Wu H. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020. V. 31. №20. P. 17461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-04302-w
  19. 19. Bhattacharya A., Jiang Y., Gao Q. et al. // J. Mater. Res. 2019. V. 34. № 12. P. 2067. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.95
  20. 20. Du H., Hu M., Li S. et al. // J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024. V. 133. P. 106475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106475
  21. 21. James K.K., Krishnaprasad P.S., Hasna K. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2015. V. 76. P. 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2014.07.024
  22. 22. Gong L., Yu R., Ohta H. et al. // Dalton Trans. 2023. V. 52. № 19. P. 6317. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DT01097J
  23. 23. Venkatesh G., Suganesh R., Jayaprakash J. et al. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022. V. 787. P. 139237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2021.139237
  24. 24. Rajasekaran P., Arivanandhan M., Sato N. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2022. V. 894. P. 162335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162335
  25. 25. Rajasekaran P., Arivanandhan M., Kumaki Y. et al. // CrystEngComm. 2020. V. 22. № 32. P. 5363. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CE00702A
  26. 26. Huang C., Wang X., Liu X. et al. //J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016. V. 36.№ 3. P. 583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.001
  27. 27. Azad A.-M., Hon N.C. // J. Alloys Compd. 1998. V. 270. № 1-2. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388 (98)00370-3
  28. 28. Berbenni V., Milanese C., Bruni G. et al. // Z. Naturforsch. B. 2012. V. 67. № 7. P. 667. https://doi.org/10.5560/znb.2012-0125
  29. 29. Kurre R., Bajpai S., Bajpai P.K. // Mater. Sci. Appl. 2018. V. 09. №01. P. 92. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2018.91007
  30. 30. Song Y.J., Kim S. //J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2001. V. 7. № 3. P. 183.
  31. 31. Haiduk Y.S., Korobko E.V., Radkevich L.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023624601065
  32. 32. Athawale A.A., Bapat M.S. D.P.A. // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2008. V. 8. № 7. P. 3661. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2008.012
  33. 33. Zhong F., Zhuang H., Gu Q. et al. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. № 48. P. 42474. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra05614h
  34. 34. Lu W., Schmidt H. // J. Mater. Sci. 2007. V. 42. № 24. P. 10007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2069-9
  35. 35. Sewify G.H., Shawky A. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023. V. 648. P. 348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.05.201
  36. 36. Licheron M., Jouan G., Husson E. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1997. V. 17. № 12. P. 1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219 (97)00002-2
  37. 37. Deepa A.S., Vidya S., Manu P.C. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2011. V. 509. № 5. P. 1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.056
  38. 38. Stanulis A., Sakirzanovas S., Van Bael M. et al. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2012. V. 64. № 3. P. 643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-012-2896-2
  39. 39. Smirnova M.N., Kop’eva M.A., Nipan G.D. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023624601089
  40. 40. Ahmed J., Blakely C.K., Bruno S.R. et al. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2012. V. 47. № 9. P. 2282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.05.044
  41. 41. Tao S., Gao F., Liu X. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2000. V. 71. № 3. P. 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005 (00)00618-3
  42. 42. Buscaglia M.T., Leoni M., Viviani M. et al. //J. Mater. Res. 2003. V. 18. № 3. P. 560. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2003.0072
  43. 43. Lu W., Schmidt H. //J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2007. V. 42. № 1. P. 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-006-1508-4
  44. 44. Koferstein R., Jager L., Zenkner M. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009. V. 29. № 11. P. 2317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.01.026
  45. 45. Loginov A.V., Mateyshina Y.G., Aparnev A.I. et al. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2018. V. 91. № 10. P. 1660. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427218100130
  46. 46. Bao M., Li W., Zhu P. // J. Mater. Sci. 1993. V. 28. № 24. P. 6617. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356405
  47. 47. Huang C., Wang X., Shi Q. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2015. V. 54. № 8. P. 4002. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00269
  48. 48. Shin S.S., Yeom E.J., Yang W.S. et al. // Science (80—.). 2017. V. 356. № 6334. P. 167. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6620
  49. 49. Shepherd W., Wilms M., van Embden J. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2019. V. 55. № 79. P. 11880. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC04838C
  50. 50. Lu W., Schmidt H. // Ceram. Int. 2008. V. 34. № 3. P. 645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2007.01.002
  51. 51. Loginov A.V., Aparnev A.I., Uvarov N.F. et al. // J. Compos. Sci. 2023. V. 7. № 11. P. 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7110469
  52. 52. Marikutsa A., Rumyantseva M., Baranchikov A. et al. // Materials (Basel). 2015. V. 8.№9. P. 6437. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095311
  53. 53. Zhang Y., Xue Z., Yu C. et al. // e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 2021. V. 19. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.1380/ejssnt.2021.104
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library