Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Hydrothermal Synthesis and Photocatalytic Prореrties of Iron-Doped Tungsten Oxide

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X24080046-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24080046
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
G. S. Zakharova
  • Affiliation: Institute of Solid State Chemistry of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 8
Pages
1117-1127
Abstract
Substitutional solid solutions of the general formula h-W1–xFexO3, where 0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.06, crystallizing in the hexagonal system based on h-WO3, were obtained using the hydrothermal synthesis method. It was shown that the crystal lattice of the synthesized compounds h-W1–xFexO3 is stabilized by cations in hexagonal channels. Using quantum chemical calculations, it has been proven that doping with iron is realized by replacing cations in the tungsten sublattice, and not by intercalation into lattice channels. In this case, the dopant is not an independent participant in reactions involving h-W1–xFexO3, causing only the reorganization of the near-Fermi states of the h-WO3 matrix. It has been established that the region of solid solution homogeneity with respect to the dopant ion is determined by the pH of the working solution. The largest specific surface area, equal to 108 m2/g, has h-W0.94Fe0.06O3, synthesized at pH 2.3. Its photoactivity when applied to 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene is several times higher than that of m-W0.94Fe0.06O3.
Keywords
оксид вольфрама допирование железо гидротермальный синтез квантово-химические расчеты фотокатализ
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Cole B., Marsen B., Miller E. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008. V. 112. № 13. P. 5213. https://doi.org/10.1021/ jp077624c
  2. 2. Huang Z.-F., Song J., Pan L. et al. // AdV. Mater. 2015. V. 27. № 36. P. 5309. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501217
  3. 3. Филиппова А.Д., Румянцев А.А., Баранчиков А.Е. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 6. С. 706.
  4. 4. Zeng F., Wang J., Liu W. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2020. V. 334. P. 135641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135641
  5. 5. Ueda T., Maeda T., Huang Z. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2018. V. 273. P. 826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.06.122
  6. 6. Wen R., Granqvist C.G., Niklasson G.A. // Nature Mater. 2015. V. 14. № 10. P. 996. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4368
  7. 7. Purushothaman K.K., Muralidharan G., Vijayakumar S. // Mater. Lett. 2021. V. 296. P. 129881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129881
  8. 8. Razali N.A.M., Salleh W.N.W., Aziz F. et al. // J. Clean. Prod. 2021. V. 309. P. 127438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127438
  9. 9. Peleyeju M.G., Viljoen E.L. // J. Water Process Eng. 2021. V. 40. P. 101930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101930
  10. 10. Desseignea M., Dirany N., Chevallier V., Arab M. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019. V. 483. P. 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.269
  11. 11. Liang Y., Yang Y., Zou C. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2019. V. 783. P. 848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.384
  12. 12. Hernandez-Uresti D.B., Sánchez-Martínez D., Martínez-de la Cruz A. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2014. V. 40. № 3. P. 4767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.09.022
  13. 13. Zakharova G.S., Podval’naya N.V., Gorbunova T.I. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2023. V. 938. P. 168620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168620
  14. 14. Dutta V., Sharma S., Raizada P. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021. V. 9. № 1. P. 105018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.10501
  15. 15. Yuju S., Xiujuan T., Dongsheng S. et al. // Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023. V. 259. P. 114988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114988
  16. 16. Козлов Д.А., Козлова Т.О., Щербаков А.Б. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 7. С. 1088.
  17. 17. Kozlov D.A., Kozlova T.O, Shcherbakov A.B. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020. V. 65. № 7. P. 1003. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362007013X
  18. 18. Govindaraj T., Mahendran C., Marnadu R. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2021. V. 47. № 3. P. 4267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.004
  19. 19. Govindaraj T., Mahendran C., Chandrasekaran J. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2022. V. 170. P. 110908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110908
  20. 20. Захарова Г.С., Подвальная Н.В., Горбунова Т.И., Первова М.Г. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 4. С. 435.
  21. 21. Shandilya P., Sambyal S., Sharma R. et al. // J. Hazard. Mater. 2022. V. 428. P. 128218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128218
  22. 22. Samuel O., Othman M.H.D., Kamaludin R. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2022. V. 48. № 5. P. 5845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.158
  23. 23. Murillo-Sierra J.C., Hernández-Ramírez A., Hinojosa-Reyes L., Guzmán-Mar J.L. // Chem. Eng. J. AdV. 2021. V. 5. P. 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100070
  24. 24. Shannow R.D. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 1976. V. 32. № 5. P. 751. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551
  25. 25. Renitta А., Vijayalakshmi K. // Catal. Commun. 2016. V. 73. P. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2015.10.014
  26. 26. Sheng C., Wang C., Wang H. et al. // J. Hazard. Mater. 2017. V. 328. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.018
  27. 27. Shen Y., Shou J., Chen L. et al. // Appl. Catal., A: General. 2022. V. 643. P. 118739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2022.118739
  28. 28. Zhang Z., Had M., Wen Z. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018. V. 434. P. 891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.074
  29. 29. Ilager D., Seo H., Shetti N.P., Kalanur S.S. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020. V. 8. № 6. P. 104580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104580
  30. 30. Rajalakshmi R., Sivaselvam S., Ponpandian N. // Mater. Lett. 2021. V. 304. P. 130664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130664
  31. 31. Ma G., Chen Z., Chen Z. et al. // Mater. Today Eng. 2017. V. 3. P. 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2017.02.003
  32. 32. Laxmi V., Kumar А. // Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019. V. 104. P. 104690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104690
  33. 33. Mehmood F., Iqbal J., Jan T., Mansoor Q. // J. Alloys Compd. 2017. V. 728. P. 1329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.234
  34. 34. Gao H., Zhu L., Peng X. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022. V. 592. P. 153310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153310
  35. 35. Song H., Li Y., Lou Z. et al. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015. V. 166−167. P. 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.020
  36. 36. Merajin M.T., Nasiri M., Abedini E., Sharifnia S. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018. V. 6. № 5. P. 6741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.037
  37. 37. Ordejón P., Artacho E., Soler J.M. // Phys. Rev. B. 1996. V. 53. № 16. P. R10441(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.R10441
  38. 38. García A., Papiore N., Akhtar A. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 152. № 20. P. 204108. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005077
  39. 39. Patterson A.L. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1939. V. 56. P. 978.
  40. 40. Al-Kuhaili M.F., Drmosh Q.A. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022. V. 281. P. 125897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.125897
  41. 41. Wang H., Zhang L., Zhou Y. et al. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020. V. 263. P. 118331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118331
  42. 42. Sing K.S.W., Everett D.H., Haul R.A.W. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 1985. V. 57. № 4. P. 603. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
  43. 43. Thöny A., Rossi M.J. // J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 1997. V. 104. № 1−3. P. 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030 (96)04575-3
  44. 44. Фаттахова З.А., Вовкотруб Э.Г., Захарова Г.С. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 1. С. 41.
  45. 45. Fattakhova Z.A., Vovkotrub E.G., Zakharova G.S. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 1. P. 35. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621010022
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library