- PII
- 10.31857/S0044457X24080012-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044457X24080012
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 69 / Issue number 8
- Pages
- 1095-1103
- Abstract
- This work reports on the possibility of producing the InGaMgO4 oxide by two-stage heat treatment of glycine-, starch- and PVA-nitrate precursors. The products formed as a result of their heating at low temperatures (≈ 90°С) were studied by powder X-ray diffraction. It was found that the powder formed from the glycine-nitrate precursor contains nanocrystalline In2O3, and drying of the polymer-nitrate compositions leads to the production of a thermally stable X-ray amorphous product. Its' annealing at temperatures above 800°C allows synthesizing InGaMgO4 powder free of impurity phases. High-temperature treatment of the powder formed from the glycine-nitrate precursor also leads to the production of InGaMgO4, but does not remove the In2O3 impurity. Using scanning electron microscopy, it was found that single-phase InGaMgO4 powders synthesized from polymer-nitrate precursors have a similar grain structure but differ in grain size distribution. Presumably, this difference is due to the structural features of starch and PVA macromolecules used for the preparation of precursors. The InGaMgO4 oxide was characterized using differential scanning calorimetry, Raman and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The value of its' band gap energy Eg was determined using the Tauc method.
- Keywords
- оксид индия-галлия-магния ромбоэдрическая сингония слоистая структура нитрат-органические прекурсоры полимеры глицин горение теплоемкость энергия ширины запрещенной зоны
- Date of publication
- 17.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 11
References
- 1. Orita M., Takeuchi M., Sakai H. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1995. V.34. № 11B. P. 1550. http://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.34.L1550
- 2. Moriga T., Sakamoto T., Sato Y. et al. // J. Solid State Chem. 1999. V. 142. № 1. P. 206. https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1998.8036
- 3. Murat A., Medvedeva J.E. // Phys. Rev. B. 2012. V. 85. № 15. P. 155101. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155101
- 4. Grajczyk R., Subramanian M.A. // Prog. Solid State Chem. 2015. V. 43. № 1–2. P. 37. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2014.09.001 Kimizuka N., Mohri T. // J. Solid State Chem. 1985. V. 60. № 3. P. 382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596 (85)90290-7
- 5. Kimizuka N., Yamazaki S. Physics and Technology of Crystalline Oxide Semiconductor CAAC-IGZO. Fundamentals. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2017.
- 6. Tanaka Y., Wada K., Kobayashi Y. et al. // CrystEngComm. 2019. V. 21. № 19. P. 2985. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CE00007K
- 7. Lo C., Hsieh T. // Ceram. Int. 2012. V. 38. № 5. P. 3977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.052
- 8. Troughton J., Atkinson D. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2019. V. 7. № 19. P. 12388. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC03933C
- 9. Blasse G., Dirksen G.J., Kimizuka N. et al. // Mater. Res. Bull. 1986. V. 21. № 9. P. 1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408 (86)90221-7
- 10. Meng X., Wang Z., Qiu K. et al. // Cryst. Growth Des. 2018. V. 18. № 8. P. 4691. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00672
- 11. Patil K.C., Hedge M.S., Rattan T., Aruna S.T. Chemistry of Nanocrystalline Oxide Materials: Combustion Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2008.
- 12. Rogachev A.S., Mukasyan A.S. // Combust. Explos. Shock Waves. 2010. V. 46. P. 243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10573-010-0036-2
- 13. Alves A.K., Bergmann C.P., Berutti F.A. Novel Synthesis and Characterization of Nanostructured Materials. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 2013.
- 14. Carlos E., Martins R. et al. // Chem. Eur. J. 2020. V. 26. № 42. P. 9099. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202000678
- 15. Chick L.A., Pederson L.R., Maupin G.D. et al. // Mater. Lett. 1990. V. 10. № 1–2. P. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-577X (90)90003-5
- 16. Khaliullin Sh.M., Zhuravlev V.D., Bamburov V.G. et al. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 93. P. 251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05189-8
- 17. Novitskaya E., Kelly J.P., Bhaduri S. et al. // Int. Mater. Rev. 2021. V. 66. № 3. P. 188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.1765603
- 18. Mastalska-Poplawska J., Sikora M., Izak P. et al. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 96. P. 511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-020-05404-x
- 19. Jiu J., Ge Y., Li X. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2002. V. 54. № 54. P. 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X (01)00573-0
- 20. Klein L., Aparicio M., Jitianu A. Handbook of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. Springer Cham, 2018.
- 21. Kondrat’eva O.N., Smirnova M.N., Nikiforova G.E. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021. V. 41. № 13. P. 6559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.05.063
- 22. Kondrat’eva O.N., Smirnova M.N., Nikiforova G.E. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2023. V. 49. № 1. P. 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.326
- 23. Смирнова М.Н., Кондратьева О.Н., Никифорова Г.Е. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 5. С. 581. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22602383
- 24. Golam A.T.M., Eakman J.M., Yarbro S.L. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995. V. 34. P. 4577. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00039a053 https://www. .chem.msu.su/cgi-bin/tkv.pl?show= welcom.html
- 25. Kelly J.T., Wexler A.S. // J. Geophys. Res. 2005. V. 110. № D11201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005583
- 26. Dorofeeva O.V., Ryzhova O.N. // J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2009. V. 41. № 4. P. 433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2008.12.001
- 27. Varma A., Mukasyan A.S., Rogachev A.S. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2016. V. 116. № 23. P. 14493. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00279
- 28. Zhang C., Pei Y., Zhao L. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014. V. 34. № 1. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.08.001
- 29. Wu M., Hsiao K., Lu H. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015. V. 162. P. 386. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.06.003
- 30. Makula P., Pacia M., Macyk W. // J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018. V. 9. № 23. P. 6814. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892
