RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Quantum‒Chemical Simulation of Molecular Hydrogen Abstraction from Magnesium Borohydride Diammoniate

PII
10.31857/S0044457X24060071-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24060071
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 6
Pages
853-865
Abstract
Within the framework of the cluster approach using the 6‒31G* basis set and the hybrid density functional (B3LYP), we modeled successive abstraction of H2 from the complexes (Mg(BH4)2∙2NH3)2 and (Mg(BH4)2∙2NH3)4. It was found that the initial stage of dehydrogenation needs overcoming energy barriers ~ 1.5‒1.2 eV, which requires preheating, then the process can go on with energy release until about 10 wt % of H2 is extracted, for a higher degree of conversion, additional energy costs exceeding the combustion heat of H2 will be required when extracting more than 12.5 wt % of H2. Therefore, further dehydrogenation of this compound may turn out to be inexpedient from the energy point of view.
Keywords
источники водорода аммиакаты борогидридов магния кластерное моделирование функционал плотности
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
4

References

  1. 1. Schlapbach L., Zuttel A. et al. // Nature. 2001. V. 414. P. 353. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104634
  2. 2. ZüttelA. et al. // Mater. Today. 2003. V. 6. P. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021 (03)00922-2
  3. 3. Семененко К.Н., Шилкин С.П., Полякова В.Б. и др. // Изв. АН СССР. Сер. хим. 1975. № 4. С. 735.
  4. 4. Коноплев В.Н., Силина Т.А. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 1985. Т. 30. С. 1125.
  5. 5. Кравченко О.В., Кравченко С.Е., Семененко К.Н. и др. // Журн. общ. химии. 1990. Т. 60. С. 2641.
  6. 6. Кравченко О.В., Хафизова Г.М., Бурдина К.П. и др. // Журн. общ. химии.1994. Т. 64. С. 6.
  7. 7. Yang Y., Liu Y., Zhang Y. et al. // J. Alloys Compounds. 2014. V. 585. P.674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.208
  8. 8. Orimo S.-I., Nakamori Y., Eliseo J.R. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2007.V. 107. P. 4111. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0501846
  9. 9. Satyapal S., Petrovic J., Read C. et al. // Catal. Today. 2007. V. 120. P. 246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.09.022
  10. 10. Lu J., Fang Z.Z., Sohn H.Y. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2006. V. 45. P. 8749. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic060836o
  11. 11. Zavorotynska O., El-Kharbachi A., Deledda S. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016. V. 41. P.14387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.015
  12. 12. Klyukin I.N., Vlasova Y.N., Novikov A.S. et al. // Symmetry. 2021.V.13. P. 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13030464
  13. 13. Klyukin I.N., Novikov A.S., Zhdanov A.P. et al. // Polyhedron. 2020.V.187. P. 114682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2020.114682
  14. 14. Зюбин А.С., Зюбина Т.С., Кравченко О.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2016. Т. 61. С. 767.
  15. 15. Зюбин А.С., Зюбина Т.С., Кравченко О.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2017. Т. 62. С. 305.
  16. 16. Зюбин А.С., Зюбина Т.С., Кравченко О.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2018. Т. 63. С. 190.
  17. 17. Solovev M.V., Chashchikhin O.V., Dorovatovskii P.V. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2018. V. 377. P. 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.090
  18. 18. Soloveichik G., Her J.-H., Stephens P.W. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2008. V. 47. P. 4290. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic7023633
  19. 19. Guo Y., Wu H., Zhou W. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011. V. 133. P. 4690. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja1105893
  20. 20. Yang Y.J., Gao M.X., Liu Y.F. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2012. V.37.P.10733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.068
  21. 21. Yang Y., Liu Y., Li Y. et al. // Chem. Asian J. 2013. V. 8. P. 476. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201200970
  22. 22. Yang Y., Liu Y., Li Y. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013. V. 117. P. 16326. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp404424m
  23. 23. Jepsen L.H., Ley M.B., Filinchuk Y. et al. // Chem-Sus. Chem. 2015. V.8. P. 1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500029
  24. 24. Paskevicius M., Jepsen L.H., Schouwink P. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017. V. 46. P. 1565. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00705h
  25. 25. Yan Y., Dononelli W., Jorgensen M. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 22. P. 9204. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp00158a
  26. 26. Chen X., Yu X. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012. V. 116. P. 11900. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp301986k
  27. 27. Yuan P.-F., Wang F., Sun Q. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2013. V. 38. P. 2836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.075
  28. 28. Wang K., Zhang J.-G., Lang X.-Q. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016. V. 18. P. 7015. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP06808H
  29. 29. Chen X., Li R., Xia G. et al. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. P. 31027. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra05322c
  30. 30. Chen X., Zou W., Li R. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018. V. 122. P. 4241. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00455
  31. 31. Зюбин А.С., Зюбина Т.С., Кравченко О.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. С. 1425.
  32. 32. Becke A.D. et al. // J.Chem.Phys. 1993. V.98. P. 5648. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913
  33. 33. Johnson B.J., Gill P.M.W., Pople J.A. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1993. V. 98. P. 5612.
  34. 34. Gaussian 09, Revision B.01. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464906
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library