- PII
- 10.31857/S0044457X24040135-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044457X24040135
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 69 / Issue number 4
- Pages
- 573-580
- Abstract
- One of the current global problems is the increasing resistance of microorganisms to antibacterial agents and the emergence of associated infections. Therefore, the synthesis of new hybrid materials capable of resisting bacteria is necessary. In this work, loading platforms for antibacterial material based on tetraethoxysilane were formed using yeast cells Ogataea polymorpha BKM Y-2559 and Cryptococcus curvatus VKM Y-3288 as templates under conditions of acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Using scanning electron microscopy, it was shown that an alkaline environment is most optimal when using yeast cells as templates for the formation of a porous material. The surface-active properties of a number of quaternary ammonium compounds were studied using the tensometry method to select the optimal template for the production of antibacterial materials in one stage.
- Keywords
- золь-гель технология четвертичные аммониевые соединения антисептические материалы порообразующий шаблон
- Date of publication
- 15.04.2024
- Year of publication
- 2024
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 36
References
- 1. Cámara M., Green W., MacPhee C. et al. // Biofilms Microbiomes. 2022. V. 8. № 1. P. 42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00306-y
- 2. Nadeem S., Gohar U., Tahir S. et al. // Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020. V. 46. № 5. P. 578. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2020.1813687
- 3. Murray C.J.L., Ikuta K.S., Sharara F. et al. // Lancet. 2022. V. 399. № 10325. P. 629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (21)02724-0
- 4. Saverina E.A., Frolov N.A., Kamanina O.A. et al. // ACS Infect. Dis. 2023. V. 9. № 3. P. 394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00469
- 5. Nielsen J.E., Alford M.A., Yung D.B.Y. et al. // ACS Infect. Dis. 2022. V. 8. № 3. P. 533. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00536
- 6. Song B., Zhang E., Han X. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 12. № 19. P. 21330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19992
- 7. Spirescu V.A., Chircov C., Grumezescu A.M. et al. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021. V. 22. № 9. P. 4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094595
- 8. Zhang T., Jin Z., Jia Z. et al. // React. Funct. Polym. 2022. V. 170. P. 105117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.105117
- 9. Ma B., Chen Y., Hu G. et al. // ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022. V. 8. № 1. P. 109. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01267
- 10. Alekseeva O.V., Smirnova D.N., Noskov A.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68. № 8. P. 953. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023623601071
- 11. Wen M., Fu X., Li T. et al. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2023. V. 93. № 9. P. 2371. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363223090189
- 12. Diaz D., Church J., Young M. et al. // J. Environ. Sci. 2019. V. 82. P. 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.03.011
- 13. Zhang H., Liu L., Hou P. et al. // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. № 9. P. 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091737
- 14. Feng X.Z., Xiao Z., Zhang L. et al. // Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020. V. 15. № 8. P. 1934578X20948365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X20948365
- 15. Garipov M.R., Sabirova A.E., Pavelyev R.S. et al. // Bioorg. Chem. 2020. V. 104. P. 104306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104306
- 16. Sokolova A.S., Yarovaya O.I., Baranova D.V. et al. // Arch. Virol. 2021. V. 166. № 7. P. 1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-021-05102-1
- 17. Gaspar C., Rolo J., Cerca N. et al. // Pathogens. 2021. V. 10. № 3. P. 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030261
- 18. Bueno V., Ghoshal S. // Langmuir. 2020. V. 36. № 48. P. 14633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02501
- 19. Zaharudin N.S., Isa E.D.M., Ahmad H. et al. // J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2020. V. 24. № 3. P. 289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2020.01.003
- 20. Stewart C.A., Finer Y., Hatton B.D. // Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 8. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19166-8
- 21. Hoa B.T., Phuc L.H., Hien N.Q. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 1. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362260160X
- 22. Kamanina O.A., Saverina E.A., Rybochkin P.V. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. № 7. P. 1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12071086
- 23. Dolinina E.S., Parfenyuk E.V. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 3. P. 401. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622030068
- 24. Voronova M.I., Surov O.V., Rubleva N.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 3. P. 395. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622030159
- 25. Ebrahiminezhad A., Najafipour S., Kouhpayeh A. et al. // Colloids Surf., B: Biointerfaces. 2014. V. 118. P. 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.03.052
- 26. Dubovoy V., Ganti A., Zhang T. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018. V. 140. № 42. P. 13534. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b04843
- 27. Bokov D., Turki Jalil A., Chupradit S. et al. // Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5102014
- 28. Yamamoto M., Takami T., Matsumura R. et al. // Biocontrol Sci. Jpn. 2016. V. 21. № 4. P. 231. https://doi.org/10.4265/bio.21.231
- 29. Frolov N.A., Fedoseeva K.A., Hansford K. et al. // ChemMedChem. 2021. V. 16. № 19. P. 2954. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202100284
- 30. Seferyan M.A., Saverina E.A., Frolov N.A. et al. // ACS Infect. Dis. 2023. V. 9. № 6. P. 1206. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00546
- 31. Xu J., Ren D., Chen N. et al. // Colloids Surf., A: Physicochem. 2021. V. 625. P. 126845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126845
- 32. Esmaeili H., Mousavi S.M., Hashemi S.A. et al. Chapter 7 – Application of biosurfactants in the removal of oil from emulsion. Elsevier, 2021. P. 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822696-4.00008-5
- 33. Azum N., Alotaibi M.M., Ali M. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2023. V. 259. P. 121057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.121057
