- PII
- 10.31857/S0044457X24030096-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044457X24030096
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 69 / Issue number 3
- Pages
- 350-363
- Abstract
- Nanopowders of the magnetite-maggemite series were synthesized by both aqueous precipitation and using sol-gel technology. A comprehensive comparative study of the structure of the synthesized powders was carried out using the methods of X-ray phase analysis (XPA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), low-temperature nitrogen adsorption and small-angle polarized neutron scattering (SAPNS). It has been established that the synthesized iron oxide nanopowders are porous systems that, depending on the synthesis method, have a one-level or two-level (for powders obtained by aqueous synthesis) and three-level (for powders obtained by the sol-gel method) hierarchical structure organization with different characteristic scales and types of aggregation for each from structural levels, and the characteristic size for the larger level in both cases exceeds 45 nm. It was revealed that the magnetic structure of the obtained iron oxide powders, regardless of the synthesis method, consists of superparamagnetic particles with a characteristic magnetic radius RМ ≈ 4 nm and magnetic-nuclear cross-correlations RMN ≈ 3 nm for powders obtained by the sol-gel method; and with RM ≈ 5–11 nm and RMN ≈ 4–8 nm for powders obtained by aqueous synthesis, depending on the production conditions.
- Keywords
- оксиды железа магнитная структура малоугловое рассеяние поляризованных нейтронов метод осаждения золь-гель метод
- Date of publication
- 15.03.2024
- Year of publication
- 2024
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 31
References
- 1. Ferreira M.I., Cova T., Paixão J.A. et al. // Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials. Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Hybrid Materials. Woodhead Publ, 2021. P. 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823688-8.00033-8
- 2. Imran M., Shaik A.H., Ansari A.R. et al. // RSC Adv. 2018. V. 8. № 25. P. 13970. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA13467C
- 3. Rashid H., Mansoor M.A., Haider B. et al. // Sep. Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 55. № 6. P. 1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2019.1585876
- 4. Aphesteguy J.C., Kurlyandskaya G.V., Celis J.P. et al. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015. V. 161. Р. 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.05.044
- 5. Nazari M., Ghasemi N., Maddah H. et al. // J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2014. V. 4. № 2. P. 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-014-0099-9
- 6. Ramos Guivar J.A., Martínez A.I., Anaya A.O. et al. // Adv. Nanopart. 2014. V. 3. № 3. P. 114. https://doi.org/10.4236/anp.2014.33016
- 7. Fedorenko N.Yu., Abiev R.Sh., Kudryashova Yu.S. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2022. V. 48. № 9. P. 13006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.174
- 8. Шилова О.А., Николаев А.М., Коваленко А.С. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 3. С. 398.
- 9. Коваленко А.С., Шилова О.А., Николаев А.М. и др. // Коллоид. журнал. 2023. Т. 85. № 3. С. 319.
- 10. Gopinath S., Philip J. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 145. № 1–2. P. 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.005
- 11. Zienkiewicz-Strzałka M., Skibińska M., Pikus S. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods., Sect. B. 2017. V. 411. P. 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.028
- 12. Nirschl H., Guo X. // Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018. V. 136. P. 431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.06.012
- 13. Shilova O.A., Nikolaev A.M., Kovalenko A.S. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2021. V. 47. № 20. P. 28866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.047
- 14. Khamova T.V., Kopitsa G.P., Nikolaev A.M. et al. // Biointer. Res. Appl. Chem. 2021. V. 11. № 4. P. 12285. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC114.1228512300
- 15. Danks A.E., Hall S.R., Schnepp Z. // Mater. Horiz. 2016. V. 3. № 2. P. 91. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mh00260e
- 16. Okorokov A.I., Runov V.V. // Physica B. 2001. V. 297. № 1–4. P. 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526 (00)00843-7
- 17. Fitzsimmons M.R., Schuller I.K. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014. V. 350. P. 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.09.028
- 18. Muhlbauer S., Honecker D., P´erigo E.A. et al. // Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019. V. 91. № 1. P. 015004. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015004
- 19. Honecker D., Bersweiler M., Erokhin S. et al. // Nanoscale Adv. 2022. V. 4. № 4. P. 1026. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NA00482D
- 20. Lee S.H., Lee D.H., Jung H. et al. // Curr. Appl. Phys. 2015. V. 15. № 8. P. 915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2015.04.003
- 21. Bergenti I., Deriu A., Savini L. et al. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2003. V. 262. № 1. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853 (03)00019-2
- 22. Grigoriev S.V., Maleyev S.V., Okorokov A.I. et al. // Europhys. Lett. 2003. V. 63. № 1. Р. 56. https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2003-00477-3
- 23. Khamova T.V., Shilova O.A., Gorshkova Yu.E. et al. // Nanosystems: Phys. Chem. Math. 2022. V. 13. № 4. P. 414. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2022-13-4-414-429
- 24. Рунов В.В., Бугров А.Н., Смыслов Р.Ю. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 2. С. 229.
- 25. Fu Z., Xiao Y., Feoktystov A. et al. // Nanoscale. 2016. V. 8. № 43. P. 18541. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr06275j
- 26. Zákutná D., Nižňanský D., Barnsley L.C. et al. // Phys. Rev. X. 2020. V. 10. № 3. P. 031019. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031019
- 27. Köhler T., Feoktystov A., Petracic O. et al. // Nanoscale. 2021. V. 13. № 4. P. 6965. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr08615k
- 28. Chouhan R.S., Horvat M., Ahmed J. et al. // Cancers. 2021. V. 13. № 9. Р. 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092213
- 29. Tran H.-V., Ngo N.M., Medhi R. et al. // Materials. 2022. V. 15. № 2. P. 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020503
- 30. Kovalenko A.S., Nikolaev A.M., Khamova T.V. et al. // Glass Phys. Chem. 2021. V. 47. № 1. Р. 67. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659621070063
- 31. Shilova O.A., Panova G.G., Nikolaev A.M. et al. // Lett. Appl. NanoBioScience. 2021. V. 10. № 2. P. 2215. https://doi.org/10.33263/LIANBS102.22152239
- 32. Wang Y., Wang S., Xu M. et al. // Environ. Pollut. 2019. V. 249. P. 1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.119
- 33. Serpoush M., Kiyasatfar M., Ojaghi J. // Mater. Today: Proc. 2022. V. 65. Part 6. P. 2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.441
- 34. Turrina Ch., Klassen A., Milani D. et al. // Heliyon. 2023. V. 9. № 6. Р. e16487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16487
- 35. Baabu P.R.S., Kumar H.K., Gumpu M.B. et al. // Materials. 2023. V. 16. № 1. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010059
- 36. Ibarra J., Melendres J., Almada M. et al. // Mater. Res. Exp. 2015. V. 2. № 9. Р. 095010. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/2/9/095010
- 37. Nasrazadani S., Raman A. // Corros. Sci. 1993. V. 34. № 8. P. 1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X (93)90092-U
- 38. Pecharroman C., Gonzalez-Carreno T., Iglesias J.E. // Phys. Chem. Miner. 1995. V. 22. P. 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202677
- 39. Anthony J.W., Bideaux R.A., Bladh K.W. Magnetite. Handbook of mineralogy. Chantilly, VA: Mineralogical Society of America, 2018.
- 40. Jülich Centre for Neutron Science, QtiKWS 2019. Available online: www.qtisas.com
- 41. Жерновой А.И., Дьяченко С.В. // Журн. техн. физики. 2015. Т. 85. № 4. С. 118.
- 42. Schaefer D.W., Justice R.S. // Macromolecules. 2007. V. 40. № 24. P. 8501. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma070356w
- 43. Баранчиков А.Е., Копица Г.П., Ёров Х.Э. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 6. С. 774.
- 44. Koizumi S., Yue Z., Tomita Y. et al. // Eur. Phys. J. E. 2008. V. 26. № 1–2. P. 137. https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2007-10259-3
- 45. Guinier A., Fournet G., Walker C.B., Yudowitch K.L. Small-Angle Scattering of X-rays. New York: Wiley, 1955.
- 46. Beaucage G., Ulibarri T.A., Black E.P. et al. Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Composites / Eds. By Mark J. et al. ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995.
- 47. Štěpánek M., Matějíček P., Procházka K. et al. // Langmuir. 2011. V. 27. № 9. P. 5275. https://doi.org/10.1021/la200442s
- 48. Bale H.D., Schmidt P.W. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984. V. 53. № 6. P. 596. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.596
- 49. Beaucage G. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1995. V. 28. № 6. P. 717. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889895005292
- 50. Ivanova L.A., Ustinovich K.B., Khamova T.V. et al. // Materials. 2020. V. 13. № 9. P. 2087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092087
- 51. Larsson P.T., Stevanic-Srndovic J., Roth S.V. et al. // Cellulose. 2022. V. 29. № 1. P. 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04291-x
- 52. Guild J.D., Knox S.T., Burholt S.B. et al. // Macromolecules. 2023. V. 56. № 16. P. 6426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00585
- 53. Porod G. // Kolloid-Zeitschrift. 1952. V. 125. № 1. P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01519615
- 54. Hammouda B. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2010. V. 43. № 4. P. 716. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889810015773
- 55. Schmidt P.W., Avnir D., Levy D. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1991. V. 94. № 2. P. 1474. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460006