Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Synthesis of copper(II) oxide nanoparticles by anion-exchange resin precipitation and production of their stable hydrosols

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X24020121-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24020121
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
А. Ю. Павликов
  • Affiliation: Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center (Federal Research Center), Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 2
Pages
245-257
Abstract
Copper (II) oxide nanoparticles are promising materials for applications in catalysis, biomedicine and photovoltaics. It is also possible to use them for the preparation of nanocomposites and hybrid nanoparticles. This work presents a new method for the synthesis of CuO nanoparticles, which allows their one-step preparation without washing and heating. The proposed anion-exchange deposition method is simple, fast and easily reproducible under normal laboratory conditions. It is shown that anion-exchange precipitation of copper in the presence of the polysaccharide dextran-40 from copper chloride and sulphate solutions produces well crystallised hydroxychloride Cu2Cl(OH)3 and hydroxysulphate Cu4(SO4)(OH)6, respectively, and from copper nitrate a weakly crystallised Cu(OH)2 phase. In the absence of polysaccharide, copper oxide nanoparticles are formed irrespective of the nature of the anion of the parent salt. The obtained materials were used to obtain hydrosols with high aggregation and sedimentation stability over a wide pH range (from 5 to 11). These sols are stable for more than 3 months at a concentration of 2 g/l (the average hydrodynamic diameter of the particles is 245 nm; the average ζ-potential is -31.1 mV). Based on the study of the optical and electronic properties of the obtained hydrosols, it was found that they could be of interest for photocatalysis and application in optoelectronic devices.
Keywords
наночастицы оксид меди анионообменный синтез
Date of publication
15.02.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
44

References

  1. 1. Poreddy R., Engelbrekt C., Riisager A. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015. V. 5. P. 2467. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY01622J
  2. 2. Aroob S., Carabineiro S.A.C., Taj M.B. et al. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13. P. 502. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13030502
  3. 3. Grigore M.E., Biscu E.R., Holban A.M. et al. // Pharmaceuticals. 2016. V. 9. P. 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph9040075
  4. 4. Lim Y.-F., Choi J.J., Hanrath T. // J. Nanomater. 2012. V. 2012. P. 4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/393160
  5. 5. Мокрушин А.С., Горбань Ю.М. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 4. С. 557.
  6. 6. Katowah D.F., Saleh S.M., Alqarni S.A. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2021. V. 11. P. 5056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84540-y
  7. 7. Kulkarni R., Kunwar S., Mandavkar R. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2020. V. 10. P. 2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102034
  8. 8. Ghosh A., Miah M., Bera A. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2021. V. 862. P. 158549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158549
  9. 9. Kano E., Kvashnin D.G., Sakai S. et al. // Nanoscale. 2017. V. 9. № 11. P. 3980. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr06874j
  10. 10. Coogan Á., Hughes L., Pursell-Milton F. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2022. V. 126. № 44. P. 18980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06540
  11. 11. Siddiqui H., Parra M.R., Pandey P. et al. // J. Sci-Adv. Mater. Dev. 2020. V. 5. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.004
  12. 12. Kayani Z.N., Umer M., Riaz S. // J. Electron. Mater. 2015. V. 44. P. 3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-3867-5
  13. 13. Arunkumar B., Johnson Jeyakumar S., Jothibas M. // Optik. 2019. V. 183. P. 698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.02.046
  14. 14. Wongpisutpaisan N., Charoonsuk P., Vittayakorn N., Pecharapa W. // Energy Procedia. 2011. V. 9. P. 404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.09.044
  15. 15. Silva N., Ramírez S., Díaz I. et al. // Materials. 2019. V. 12. P. 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050804
  16. 16. Claros M., Gràcia I., Figueras E., Vallejos S. // Chemosensors. 2022. V. 10. P. 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10090353
  17. 17. Zhu J., Li D., Chen H. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2004. V. 58. P. 3324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.031
  18. 18. Rujun W., Zhenye M., Zhenggui G., Yan Y. // J. Alloys Compd. 2010. V. 504. P. 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.062
  19. 19. Phiwdang K., Suphankij S., Mekprasart W., Pecharapa W. // Energy Procedia. 2013. V. 34. P. 740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.808
  20. 20. Вулих А.И. Ионный обмен. М.: Химия, 1973. 232 с.
  21. 21. Сайкова С.В., Пашков Г.Л., Пантелеева М.В. Реакционно-ионообменные процессы извлечения цветных металлов и синтеза дисперсных материалов. Красноярск, 2018. 198 с.
  22. 22. Сайкова С.В., Трофимова Т.В., Павликов А.Ю., Самойло А.С. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 3. С. 287.
  23. 23. El-Nahhal I.M., Elmanama A.A., Amara N. et al. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018. V. 215. P. 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.05.012
  24. 24. Iqbal Z., Siddiqui V.U., Alam M. et al. // AIP Conf. Proc. 2020. V. 2276. P. 020010. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025688
  25. 25. Blinov A.V., Gvozdenko А.А., Yasnaya М.А. et al. // Her. Bauman Moscow State Tech. Univ. Ser. Nat. Sci. 2020. V. 3. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.18698/1812-3368-2020-3-56-70
  26. 26. Aureen Albert A., Harris Samuel D.G., Parthasarathy V. et al. // Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019. V. 207. P. 319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1588731
  27. 27. El Sayed A.M., El-Gamal S., Morsi W.M. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2015. V. 50. P. 4717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9023-z
  28. 28. Казимирова К.О., Штыков С.Н. // Изв. Сарат. ун-та. Нов. сер. Серия: Химия. Биология. Экология. 2018. Т. 18. № 2. С. 126. https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9775-2018-18-2-126-133
  29. 29. Arena A., Scandurra G., Ciofi C. // Sensors. 2017. V. 17. P. 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102198
  30. 30. Mikhlin Y.L., Vishnyakova E.A., Romanchenko A.S. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014. V. 297. P. 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.081
  31. 31. Vorobyev S., Vishnyakova E., Likhatski M. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2019. V. 9. P. 1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111525
  32. 32. Карпов Д.В. // Металлургия цветных, редких и благородных металлов. 2022. С. 119.
  33. 33. Карпов Д.В., Воробьев С.А., Антипова Ю.В. и др. // Химическая наука и образование Красноярья. 2022. С. 37
  34. 34. Mudunkotuwa I.A., Grassian V.H. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010. V. 132. P. 14986. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja106091q
  35. 35. Field T.B., McCourt J.L., McBryde W.A.E. // Can. J. Chem. 1974. V. 52. P. 3119. https://doi.org/10.1139/v74-458
  36. 36. Dheyab M.A., Aziz A.A., Jameel M.S. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2020. V. 10. P. 10793. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67869-8
  37. 37. Goodarzi A., Sahoo Y., Swihart M.T. et al. // MRS Online Proceedings Library. 2003. V. 789. P. 23. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-789-N6.6
  38. 38. Saikova S., Pavlikov A., Trofimova T. et al. // Metals. 2020. V. 11. № 5. P. 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050705
  39. 39. Saikova S., Pavlikov A., Karpov D. et al. // Materials. 2023. V. 16. P. 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062318
  40. 40. Васильев В.П., Золоторёв Е.К., Капустинский А.Ф. // Журн. физ. химии. 1960. Т. 34. № 8. С. 1761.
  41. 41. Сайкова С.В., Пашков Г.Л., Пантелеева М.В. и др. // Журнал Сибирского федерального университета. Химия. 2011. Т. 4. № 4. С. 329.
  42. 42. Pashkov G.L., Saikova S.V., Panteleeva M.V. et al. // Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2014. V. 48. P. 671. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579514050066
  43. 43. Saikova S.V., Panteleeva M.V., Nikolaeva R.B. et al. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2002. V. 75. P. 1787. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022249817628
  44. 44. Livage J., Henry M., Sanchez C. // Prog. Solid State Chem. 1988. V. 18. P. 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6786 (88)90005-2
  45. 45. Norkus E., Vaičiūnien J., Vuorinen T. et al. // Carbohydrate Polymers. 2002. V. 50. P. 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617 (02)00056-5
  46. 46. Cudennec Y., Lecerf A. // Solid State Sci. 2003. V. 5. P. 1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2003.09.009
  47. 47. Singh D.P., Ojha A.K., Srivastava O.N. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2009. V. 113. P. 3409. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp804832g
  48. 48. Vaseem M., Hong A.R., Kim R.T. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2013. V. 1. P. 2112. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TC00869J
  49. 49. Nikolić G.S., Cakić M.D. // New Analytical Approaches and FTIR Strategies. 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/16133
  50. 50. Savic I., Nikolic G., Cakic M. // Acta Chromatogr. 2010. V. 22. P. 375. https://doi.org/10.1556/AChrom.22.2010.3.3
  51. 51. Evsevskaya N., Pikurova E., Saikova S.V. et al. // ACS Omega. 2020. V. 5. P. 4542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03877
  52. 52. Сайкова С.В., Киршнева Е.А., Пантелеева М.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2019. Т. 64. № 10. С. 1013.
  53. 53. Сайкова С.В., Пашков Г.Л. Пантелеева М.В. и др. // Журнал Сибирского федерального университета. Химия. 2010. Т. 3. № 1. С. 27.
  54. 54. Shinohara S., Eom N., The E.-J. et al. // Langmuir. 2018. V. 34. P. 2595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03116
  55. 55. Kosmulski M. // Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016. V. 238. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2016.10.005
  56. 56. Parks G.A. // Chem. Rev. 1965. V. 65. P. 177. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60234a002
  57. 57. Drozdov A.S., Ivanovski V., Avnir D. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016. V. 468. P. 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.061
  58. 58. Xie Y., Carbone L., Nobile C. et al. // ACS Nano. 2013. V. 7. P. 7352. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn403035s
  59. 59. Montgomery M.J., Sugak N., Yang Ke R. et al. // Nanoscale. 2020. V. 12. P. 14549. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR02208J
  60. 60. Wang Y., Lany S., Ghanbaja J. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2016. V. 94. P. 245418. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.245418
  61. 61. Chen Z., Jaramillo T. // Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University Edited by Bruce Brunschwig. 2017.
  62. 62. Василевский А.М., Коноплев Г.А., Панов М.Ф. // Оптико-физические методы исследований: Методические указания к лабораторным работам. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГЭТУ “ЛЭТИ”, 2011. 56 с.
  63. 63. Rydosz A., Kollbek K., Kim-Ngan NT.H. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. — Mater. Electron. 2020. V. 31. P. 11624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03713-z
  64. 64. Hamad H., Elsenety M.M., Sadik W. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2022. V. 12. P. 2217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05981-7
  65. 65. Ahmad F., Agusta M.K., Dipojono H.K. // J. Phys: Conference Series. 2016. V. 739. P. 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012040
  66. 66. Jamal M., Shahriyar Nishat S., Sharif A. // Chem. Phys. 2021. V. 545. P. 111160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2021.111160
  67. 67. Sakib A.A.M., Masum S.M., Hoinkis J. et al. // J. Compos. Sci. 2019. V. 3. P. 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3030091
  68. 68. Zhang X., Yang Y., Que W., Du Y. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. P. 81607. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA12281G
  69. 69. Ahmad I., Shukrullah S., Yasin M.N. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2023. V. 48. P. 12683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.289
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library