- PII
- 10.31857/S0044457X23601360-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044457X23601360
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 68 / Issue number 12
- Pages
- 1683-1690
- Abstract
- Phosphates Li1 + xTi1.8 – xFexGe0.2(PO4)3 (x = 0.1–0.3) with the NASICON structure have been prepared and studied for the first time. It has been shown that co-doping with germanium and iron leads to significant increase in the ionic conductivity of the prepared materials at low degrees of titanium substitution. The influence of the synthesis method (solid-state and sol-gel) and conditions of precursor processing on the ionic conductivity of the materials has been studied. Optimum conditions for the mechanical processing of precursors have been found to obtain ceramics with the highest conductivity. Li1.2Ti1.6Fe0.2Ge0.2(PO4)3 prepared by the solid-state method exhibits the highest ionic conductivity at room temperature (1.7 × 10–4 S/cm) among all samples.
- Keywords
- фосфат лития-титана твердый электролит содопирование твердофазный синтез золь-гель
- Date of publication
- 01.12.2023
- Year of publication
- 2023
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 45
References
- 1. Manthiram A., Yu X., Wang S. // Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017. V. 2. P. 16103. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.103
- 2. Zheng F., Kotobuki M., Song S. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2018. V. 389. P. 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.022
- 3. Chinnam P.R., Clymer R.N., Jalil A.A. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2015. V. 27. P. 5479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00940
- 4. Li Q., Chen J., Fan L. et al. // Green Energy Environ. 2016. V. 1. P. 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2016.04.006
- 5. Gao Z., Sun H., Fu L. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2018. V. 30. P. 1705702. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705702
- 6. Prakash P., Fall B., Aguirre J. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2023. V. 22. P. 627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01508-1
- 7. Hou M., Liang F., Chen K. et al. // Nanotechnol. 2020. V. 31. P. 132003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab5be7
- 8. Hossain E., Faruque H., Sunny M. et al. // Energies. 2020. V. 13. P. 3651. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143651
- 9. Voropaeva D.Yu., Safronova E.Yu., Novikova S.A. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2022. V. 32. P. 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2022.05.001
- 10. Zhang C., Wei Y.-L., Cao P.-F. et al. // Renew. Sustain Energy Rev. 2018. V. 82. P. 3091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.030
- 11. Wang L., Li J., Lu G. et al. // Front. Mater. 2020. V. 7. P. 111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00111
- 12. Duan H., Oluwatemitope F., Wu S. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 12. P. 52271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c16966
- 13. Subramanian K., Alexander G.V., Karthik K. et al. // J. Energy Storage. 2021. V. 33. P. 102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.102157
- 14. Bachman J.C., Muy S., Grimaud A. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2016. V. 116. P. 140.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563
- 15. Куншина Г.Б., Бочарова И.В., Щербина О.Б. // Неорган. материалы. 2022. Т. 58. С. 155.
- 16. Stenina I.A., Pinus I.Yu., Rebrov A.I. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2004. V. 175. № 1–4. P. 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2003.12.037
- 17. Fang Y., Zhang J., Xiao L. et al. // Adv. Sci. 2017. V. 4. P. 1600392. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600392
- 18. Thirupathi R., Kumari V., Chakrabarty S. et al. // Progr. Mater. Sci. 2023. V. 137. P. 101128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101128
- 19. Aono H., Sugimoto E., Sadaoka Y. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990. V. 137. P. 1023. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2086597
- 20. Kahlaoui R., Arbi K., Sobrados I. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2017. V. 56. P. 1216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02274
- 21. Arbi K., Lazarraga M.G., Chehimi D.B.H. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2004. V. 16. P. 255. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm030422i
- 22. Свитанько А.И., Новикова С.А., Стенина И.А. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2014. Т. 50. С. 295. [Svitan’ko A.I., Novikova S.A., Stenina I.A. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2014. V. 50. P. 273.] https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168514030145
- 23. Куншина Г.Б., Громов О.Г., Локшин Э.П., Калинников В.Т. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2014. Т. 59. С. 589. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044457X14050122
- 24. Xiao W., Wang J., Fan L. et al. // Energy Storage Mater. 2019. V. 19. P. 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.012
- 25. Perez-Estebanez M., Isasi-Marin J., Tobbens D.M. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2014. V. 266. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2014.07.018
- 26. Zhang P., Matsui M., Hirano A. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2013. V. 253. P. 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.022
- 27. Stenina I., Pyrkova A., Yaroslavtsev A. // Batteries. 2023. V. 9. № 1. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010059
- 28. Safanama D., Adams S. // J. Power Sources. 2017. V. 340. P. 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.076
- 29. Rettenwander D., Welzl A., Pristat S. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016. V. 4. P. 1506. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA08545D
- 30. Wu P., Zhou W., Su X. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2023. V. 13. P. 2203440. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203440
- 31. Медведева А.Е., Махонина Е.В., Печень Л.С. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. С. 896. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22070157
- 32. Лапшин О.В., Болдырева Е.В., Болдырев В.В. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. С. 402. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X21030119
- 33. Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Solid State Ionics. 2005. V. 176. P. 2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2005.09.025
- 34. DeWees R., Wang H. // ChemSusChem. 2019. V. 12. P. 3713. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201900725
- 35. Paolella A., Zhu W., Campanella D. et al. // Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2022. V. 36. P. 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2022.101108
- 36. Курзина Е.А., Стенина И. А., Dalvi А. и др. // Неорган. Материалы. 2021. Т. 57. № 10. С. 1094. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002337X21100079
- 37. Yaroslavtsev A., Stenina I. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006. V. 51. Suppl. 1. P. S97. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023606130043
