Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Thermal Transformations of Porous Anodic Aluminum Oxide Formed in Sulfuric Acid/Oxalic Acid Mixed Electrolytes

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X22602061-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X22602061
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
I. V. Roslyakov
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 7
Pages
988-996
Abstract
Aluminum anodizing in electrolytes comprising mixtures of several acids opens way to manufacture porous films of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) with a widely tunable structure period. Study of thermal transformations in AAO films produced in mixed electrolytes is a separate task, as a complex chemical composition of the material can give rise to some specifics in subsequent annealing. Impurity oxalate and sulfate ions were detected in the AAO produced by aluminum anodizing in sulfuric acid/oxalic acid mixed electrolytes. The sulfate weight fraction appears about one order of magnitude higher than the oxalate weight fraction, and it increases as the concentration ratio of sulfuric acid to oxalic acid in the electrolyte increases. In the same way, the crystallization temperature of amorphous AAO to a mixture of low-temperature Al2O3 polymorphs increases in response to increasing concentration ratio of sulfuric acid and oxalic acid. Thus, the component ratio in the mixed electrolyte used influences the composition and thermal transformations of AAO.
Keywords
анодный оксид алюминия анодирование серная кислота щавелевая кислота термическая обработка
Date of publication
01.07.2023
Year of publication
2023
Number of purchasers
0
Views
45

References

  1. 1. Domagalski J.T., Xifre-Perez E., Marsal L.F. // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 11. P. 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020430
  2. 2. Petukhov D.I., Chernova E.A., Kapitanova O.O. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 2019. V. 577. P. 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.01.041
  3. 3. Roslyakov I.V., Petukhov D.I., Napolskii K.S. // Nanotechnology. 2021. V. 32. P. 33LT01. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abfeea
  4. 4. Petukhov D.I., Kan A.S., Chumakov A.P. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 2021. V. 621. P. 118994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118994
  5. 5. Valeev R., Romanov E., Beltukov A. et al. // Phys. Status Solidi C. 2012. V. 9. P. 1462. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.201100677
  6. 6. Gordeeva E.O., Roslyakov I.V., Leontiev A.P. et al. // Beilstein J. Nanotechnology. 2021. V. 12. P. 957. https://doi.org/doi:10.3762/bjnano.12.72
  7. 7. Ryzhkov I.I., Kharchenko I.A., Mikhlina E.V. et al. // Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 2021. V. 176. P. 121414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121414
  8. 8. Lee Y.H., Chang I., Cho G.Y. et al. // Int. J. Precision Engineering Manufacturing-Green Technology. 2018. V. 5. P. 441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0047-0
  9. 9. Roslyakov I.V., Kolesnik I.V., Evdokimov P.V. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2021. V. 330. P. 129307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.129307
  10. 10. Kalinin I.A., Roslyakov I.V., Tsymbarenko D.M. et al. // Sens. Actuators, A. 2021. V. 317. P. 112457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2020.112457
  11. 11. Santos A. // J. Mater. Chem. C 2017. V. 5. P. 5581. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC05555A
  12. 12. Szwachta G., Bialek E., Wlodarski M. et al. // Nanotechnology. 2022. V. 33. P. 455707. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac83ca
  13. 13. Sadykov A.I., Kushnir S.E., Roslyakov I.V. et al. // Electrochem. Commun. 2019. V. 100. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2019.01.027
  14. 14. Roslyakov I.V., Gordeeva E.O., Napolskii K.S. // Electrochim. Acta. 2017. V. 241. P. 362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.140
  15. 15. Gordeeva E.O., Roslyakov I.V., Napolskii K.S. // Electrochim. Acta. 2019. V. 307. P. 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.098
  16. 16. Petukhov D.I., Napolskii K.S., Berekchiyan M.V. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013. V. 5. P. 7819. https://doi.org/10.1021/am401585q
  17. 17. Noyan A.A., Leontiev A.P., Yakovlev M.V. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2017. V. 226. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.142
  18. 18. Masuda H., Hasegwa F., Ono S. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997. V. 144. P. L127. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837634
  19. 19. Masuda H., Fukuda K. // Science. 1995. V. 268. P. 1466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.268.5216.1466
  20. 20. Nishinaga O., Kikuchi T., Natsui S. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2013. V. 3. P. 2748. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02748
  21. 21. Akiya S., Kikuchi T., Natsui S. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2016. V. 190. P. 471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.162
  22. 22. Masuda H., Yada K., Osaka A. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998. V. 37. P. L1340. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.37.L1340
  23. 23. Almasi Kashi M., Ramazani A., Noormohammadi M. et  al. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2007. V. 40. P. 7032. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/22/025
  24. 24. Almasi Kashi M., Ramazani A., Mayamai Y. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2010. V. 49. P. 015202–1. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.49.015202
  25. 25. Xu Y.F., Liu H., Li X.J. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2015. V. 151. P. 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.03.049
  26. 26. Mardilovich P.P., Govyadinoy A.N., Mazurenko N.I. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 1995. V. 98. P. 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388 (94)00185-2
  27. 27. Ширин Н.А., Росляков И.В., Берекчиян М.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2013. Т. 67. № 6. С. 868.
  28. 28. Lee Y.H., Ren H., Wu E.A. et al. // Nano Lett. 2020. V. 20. P. 2943. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02344
  29. 29. Kousar R., Kim S.H., Byun J.Y. // J. King Saud University - Engineer. Sci. 2021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.09.003
  30. 30. Гордеева Е.О., Росляков И.В., Садыков А.И. и др. // Электрохимия. 2018. Т. 54. № 11. С. 999.
  31. 31. Schneider C.A., Rasband W.S., Eliceiri K.W. // Nat. Methods. 2012. V. 9. P. 671. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
  32. 32. Программы для анализа упорядочения пор в анодном оксиде алюминия. http://www.eng.fnm.msu.ru/software/
  33. 33. Lee W., Park S.J. // Chem. Rev. 2014. V. 114. P. 7487. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500002z
  34. 34. Parkhutik V.P. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1992. V. 25. P. 1258. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/25/8/017
  35. 35. Kim M., Kim H., Bae C. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014. V. 118. P. 26789. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507576c
  36. 36. Накамото К. ИК-спектры и спектры КР неорганических и координационных соединений / Пер. с англ. под ред. Пентина Ю.А. М.: Мир, 1991.
  37. 37. Vrublevsky I., Chernyakova K., Ispas A. et al. // J. Lumin. 2011. V. 131. P. 938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.12.027
  38. 38. Mata-Zamora M.E., Saniger J.M. // Revista Mexicana de Fisica. 2005. V. 51. P. 502.
  39. 39. Roslyakov I.V., Kolesnik I.V., Levin E.E. et al. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020. V. 381. P. 125159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125159
  40. 40. Roslyakov I.V., Shirin N.A., Berekchiian M.V. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020. V. 294. P. 109840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109840
  41. 41. Lide D.R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th ed. CRC Press (2003).
  42. 42. Mardilovich P.P., Govyadinov A.N., Mukhurov N.I. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 1995. V. 98. P. 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388 (94)00184-Z
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library