- PII
- 10.31857/S0044457X22602036-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044457X22602036
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 68 / Issue number 5
- Pages
- 613-622
- Abstract
- Magnesium–aluminum layered double hydroxides and mixed oxides based on them were obtained by high and low supersaturation methods and analyzed. It was shown that the phase composition and formation of nano-sized particles with a large surface area is significantly affected by the rate of introduction of magnesium–aluminum systems into the medium of the precipitated material. All of the obtained samples were studied by thermogravimetric analysis with mass-spectrometric detection, X-ray diffractometry, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and infrared spectroscopy.
- Keywords
- слоистый двойной гидроксид смешанный оксид магний алюминий наночастицы активная площадь поверхности
- Date of publication
- 17.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 12
References
- 1. Hájek M. // Chem. Eng. J. 2015. V. 263. P. 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.006
- 2. Tanaka R., Ogino. I., Mukai S.R. // ACS Omega. 2018. V. 3. № 12. P. 16916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02557
- 3. Kuljiraseth J. // Appl. Catal. B. 2019. V. 243. P. 415. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.073
- 4. Kocík J. // J. Mol. Catal. 2021. V. 516. P. 111946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111946
- 5. Octavian D.P., Didier Tichit I.C.M. // Appl. Clay Sci. 2012. V. 61. P. 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.03.006
- 6. Dixit M., Manish D., Manish M. et al. // Chem. Eng. Ind. J. 2013. V. 19. № 2. P. 458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.028
- 7. Climent M.J., Corma A., Iborra S., Primo J. // J. Catal. 1994. V. 151. № 1. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1995.1008
- 8. Pérez C.N. // Química Nova. 2009. V. 32. № 9. P. 2341. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422009000900020
- 9. Hora L. // Catalysis Today. 2014. V. 223. P. 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.022
- 10. Jorge P., Joseph L., François F. // Catalysis J. 2002. V. 211. № 1. P. 150. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3706
- 11. Bolognini M. // Catal. Today. 2002. V. 75. № 1–4. P. 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861 (02)00050-0
- 12. Xiao Z. // Mol. Catal. 2017. V. 436. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.04.016
- 13. Cosano D., Hidalgo-Carrillo J., Esquivel D. et al. // J. Porous Mater. 2020. V. 27. № 2. P. 441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-019-00825-8
- 14. Quesada J., Faba L., Diaz E., Ordonez S. // Appl. Catal. A. 2017. V. 542. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2017.06.001
- 15. He J., Wei M., Li B. et al. // Structure and Bonding Layered Double Hydroxides. 2006. V. 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/430/006
- 16. Горелик С.С., Расторгуев Л.Н., Скаков Ю.А. Рентгенографический и электронно-оптический анализ. М.: МИСИС, 1994. 328 с.
- 17. Kong L. // Chem. Eng. J. 2019. V. 371. P. 893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.116
- 18. Leont`eva N.N., Drozdov V.D., Bel`skaya O.B., Cherepanova S.V. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2020. V. 90. № 3. P. 509. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363220030275
- 19. Nguyễn K.D.H., Hoàng N.D. // Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 2015. V. 52. № 6. P. 755. https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-708X/52/6/3636
- 20. Libor Č., Petr K., Lucie S., Martin H. // Top. Catal. 2013 V. 56. № 9–10. P. 586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0008-3
- 21. Débora L.C., Roberto R.A., Michelly T.R. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2012. V. 415–416. P. 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.12.009
- 22. Kikhtyanin O., Capek L., Smoláková L. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017. V. 56. № 45. P. 13411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03367
- 23. Masoud S., Afshin T.M., Seyed A.H., Sakineh M. // J. Water Environ. Nanotechnol. 2021. V. 6. № 1. P. 72. https://doi.org/10.22090/jwent.2021.01.007
- 24. Huang P.P. // RSC. Adv. 2015. V. 5. № 14. P. 10412. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15160G
- 25. Varga G., Szabados M., Kukovecz Á. et al. // Mater. Res. Lett. 2020. V. 8. № 2. P. 68. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.1700199
- 26. Abniki M., Moghimi A., Azizinejad F. // JSCS. 2020. V. 85. № 9. P. 1223. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC191011004A
- 27. Chen L., Sun B., Wang X. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2013. V. 1. № 17. P. 2268. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB00044C
- 28. Huang P.-P., Cao C.-Y., Wei F. et al. // RSC Adv. 2015. V. 5. № 14. P. 10412. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15160G
- 29. Cardinale A.M., Carbone C., Consani S. et al. // Crystals. 2020. V. 10. № 6. P. 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10060443
- 30. Hag-Soo K., Yohtaro Y., Je-Deok K. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2010. V. 181. № 19–20. P. 883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2010.04.037
- 31. Wang X., Zhu X., Meng X. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 56. P. 34984. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra04646d
- 32. Aisawa S., Nakada C., Hirahara H. et al. // Appl. Clay Science. 2019. V. 180. P. 105205. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.clay.2019.105205
- 33. Zaghouane-Boudiaf H., Boutahala M., Arab L. // Chem. Eng. J. 2012. V. 187. P. 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.112
- 34. Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A.V. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2015. V. 87. № 9–10. P. 1051. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
