Simulation of Spin Selectivity of Electrical Conductivity of Chiral Platinum Nanotubes

D’yachkov, P. N.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X2260181X

PII

10.31857/S0044457X2260181X-1

DOI

10.31857/S0044457X2260181X

Publication type

Status

Published

Authors

P. N. D’yachkov

Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Volume/ Edition

Volume 68 / Issue number 4

Pages

492-498

Abstract

To study the electronic and spin properties of single-walled platinum nanotubes, two rows of chiral nanotubes have been calculated by the relativistic method of symmetrized linearized augmented cylindrical waves: Pt(5, n2) with 1 ≤ n2 ≤ 4 and Pt(10, n2) with 1 ≤ n2 ≤ 9 and radii from 2.24 to 7.78 Å. In all tubes, the intersection of the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band with the Fermi level is observed, which is characteristic of compounds with a semi-metallic band structure. The spin–orbit coupling manifests itself as a splitting of nonrelativistic dispersion curves, which can exceed 0.5 eV for near-Fermi bands and decreases upon transition to the internal states of the valence band and nanotubes of larger diameter. The spin densities of states for electrons with spin up and down at the Fermi level are noticeably different, which can be used to create pure spin currents through nanotubes using alternating electrical voltage. The (5, 3) and (10, 7) nanotubes are the most suitable for this.

Keywords

хиральность цилиндрические волны спин-орбитальное взаимодействие спиновые токи наноэлектроника

Date of publication

01.04.2023

Year of publication

2023

Number of purchasers

Views

References

1. Oshima Y., Koizumi H., Mouri K. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2002. V. 65. P. 121401(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.121401
2. Oshima Y., Onga A., Takayanagi K. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003. V. 91. P. 205503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.205503
3. Huang Z., Raciti D., Yu S. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016. V. 138. P. 6332. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b01328
4. Bi Y., Lu G. // Electrochem. Commun. 2009. V. 11. P. 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2008.10.023
5. Lou X.W., Archer L.A., Yang Z. // Adv. Mater. 2008. V. 20. P. 3987. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800854
6. Zhang G., Sun S., Cai M. et al. // Scient. Rep. 2013. V. 3. P. 1526. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01526
7. Hendren W.R., Murphy A., Evans P. et al. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2008. V. 20. P. 362203. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/36/362203
8. Oshima Y., Mouri K., Hirayama H. et al. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2006. V. 75. P. 053705. https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.75.053705
9. Del Valle M., Tejedor C., Cuniberti G. // Phys. Rev. B. 2006. V. 74. P. 045408. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.045408
10. Rajalaa T., Kronberga R., Backhouse R. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020. V. 265. P. 118582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118582
11. Ono T., Hirose K. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005. V. 94. P. 206806. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.206806
12. Zhang K., Zhang H. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014. V. 118. P. 635. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp410056u
13. Shimada T., Ishii Y., Kitamura T. // Phys. Rev. B. 2011. V. 84. P. 165452. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165452
14. Manrique D.Zs., Cserti J., Lambert C.J. // Phys. Rev. B. 2010. V. 81. P. 073103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.073103
15. Andersen O.K. // Phys. Rev. B. 1970. V. 2. P. 883. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.2.883
16. Bordoloit A.K., Auluck S. // J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 1983. V. 13. P. 2101. https://https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/13/10/019
17. Wern H., Courths R., Leschik G. et al. // Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter. 1985. V. 60. P. 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01304449
18. Herrera-Suárez H.J., Rubio-Ponce A., Olguín D. // Revista Mexicana de Física. 2012. V. 58. P. 46. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1311.5929
19. Matanović I., Kent P.R.C., Garzon F.H. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013. V. 160. P. F548. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.047306jes
20. Xiao L., Wang L. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006. V. 430. P. 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.09.032
21. Hui L., Pederiva F., Guanghou W. et al. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003. V. 381. P. 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2003.08.110
22. Konar S., Gupta B.C. // Phys. Rev. B. 2008. V. 78. P. 235414. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.235414
23. Дьячков П.Н., Дьячков Е.П. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 8. С. 1073. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X20070077
24. Krasnov D.O., Khoroshavin L.O., D’yachkov P.N. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019. V. 64. P. 108. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023619010145
25. D’yachkov E.P., D’yachkov P.N. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019. V. 123. P. 26005. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07610
26. D'yachkov P.N., Krasnov D.O. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019. V. 720. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.02.006
27. Ando T. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2000. V. 69. P. 1757. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.74.777
28. Minot E.D., Yaish Y., Sazonova V. et al. // Nature. 2004. V. 428. P. 536. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02425
29. Kuemmeth F., Ilani S., Ralph D.C. et al. // Nature. 2008. V. 452. P. 448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06822
30. Дьячков П.Н. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 10. С. 1441. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22100385
31. D’yachkov P.N. Quantum Chemistry of Nanotubes: Electronic Cylindrical Waves; CRC Press. London: Taylor and Francis, 2019. 212 p.
32. D’yachkov P.N., Makaev. D.V. // Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2016. V. 116. P. 316. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25030
33. Banerjee-Ghosh K., Dor O.B., Tassinari F. et al. // Science. 2018. V. 360. P. 1331. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4265
34. Naaman R., Waldeck D.H. // Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2015. V. 66. P. 263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040214-121554
35. Gutierrez R., D́ıaz E., Gaul C. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013. V. 117. P. 22276. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp401705x
36. Yang S.H. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021. V. 16. P. 120502. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0039147
37. Yang S.H., Naaman R., Paltiel Y. et al. // Nat. Rev. Phys. 2021. V. 3. P. 328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00302-9
38. Michaeli K., Kantor-Uriel N., Naamanm R. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016. V. 45. P. 6478. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00369A
39. Bercioux D., Lucignano P. // Rep. Prog. Phys. V. 78. P. 106001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/10/106001
40. Manchon A., Koo H.C., Nitta J. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2015. V. 14. P. 871. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4360

GOST	D’yachkov P. Simulation of Spin Selectivity of Electrical Conductivity of Chiral Platinum Nanotubes // Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. – 2023. – V. 68. – Issue number 4 C. 492-498 . URL: https://inorgchemras.ru/10-31857-s0044457x2260181x-1/?version_id=112778. DOI: 10.31857/S0044457X2260181X
MLA	D’yachkov, P. N "Simulation of Spin Selectivity of Electrical Conductivity of Chiral Platinum Nanotubes." Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 68.4 (2023).:492-498. DOI: 10.31857/S0044457X2260181X
APA	D’yachkov P. (2023). Simulation of Spin Selectivity of Electrical Conductivity of Chiral Platinum Nanotubes. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. vol. 68, no. 4, pp.492-498 DOI: 10.31857/S0044457X2260181X

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

Simulation of Spin Selectivity of Electrical Conductivity of Chiral Platinum Nanotubes

You can

References

Индексирование

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

Simulation of Spin Selectivity of Electrical Conductivity of Chiral Platinum Nanotubes

You can

References

Индексирование

Via social network