RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Effect of Fluorine on Thermoluminescence in LiMgPO4

PII
10.31857/S0044457X22601328-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X22601328
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 2
Pages
265-270
Abstract
Fluorine-doped lithium magnesium phosphate has been studied for the first time. It has been shown that fluorine significantly enhances the intensity of thermally stimulated luminescence. To find the preferred positions of fluorine and structural distortions caused by aliovalent substitution, ab initio calculations have been performed, which demonstrate that fluorine is not included into the (PO4)3– anion; rather, it promotes the formation of clusters simultaneously containing lithium and fluorine ions.
Keywords
фосфат фторид лития термолюминесценция дозиметрия дефекты
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Abdel Rahman R.O., Hung Y.T. // Water. 2020. V. 12. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010019
  2. 2. Pyshkina M.D., Nikitenko V.O., Zhukovsky M.V., Ekidin A.A. // AIP Conf. Proc. 2019. V. 2174. P. 020158. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5134309
  3. 3. Noor N.M., Fadzil M.S.A., Ung N. et al. // Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016. V. 126. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.05.001
  4. 4. Rivera T. // Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2012. V. 71. P. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.05.001
  5. 5. Sears D.W., Sears H., Sehlke A., Hughes S.S. // J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2018. V. 349. P. 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.09.022
  6. 6. Miyahara M.M., Sugi E., Katoh T. et al. // Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012. V. 81. P. 705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.09.022
  7. 7. Ivanov S.A., Stash A.I., Bush A.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. P. 588. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622050096
  8. 8. Sidorov A.I., Kirpichenko D.A., Yurina U.V., Podsvi-rov O.A. // Glass Phys. Chem. 2021. V. 47. P. 118. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659621020140
  9. 9. Antonov-Romanovsky V.V. // J. Phys. Radium. 1956. V. 17. P. 694. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00234423
  10. 10. Menon S.N., Singh A.K., Kadam S. et al. // J. Food Proc. Preserv. 2019. V. 43. P. 13891. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13891
  11. 11. Guo J., Tang Q., Zhang C. et al. // J. Rare Earths. 2017. V. 35. P. 525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0721 (17)60943-8
  12. 12. Gieszczyk W., Bilski P., Kłosowski M. et al. // Radiat. Measur. 2018. V. 113. P. 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.03.007
  13. 13. Palan C.B., Bajaj N.S., Soni A., Omanwar S.K. // Bull. Mater Sci. 2016. V. 39. P. 1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-016-1261-4
  14. 14. Dhabekar B., Menon S.N., Raja E.A. et al. // Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. B. 2011. V. 269. P. 1844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.05.001
  15. 15. Bajaj N.S., Palan C.B., Koparkar K.A. et al. // J. Lumines. 2016. V. 175. P. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.02.003
  16. 16. Chougaonkar M.P., Kumar M., Bhatt B.C. // Int. J. Lum. Appl. 2012. V. 2. P. 194.
  17. 17. Keskin I.Ç., Türemis M., Katı M.I. et al. // J. Lumines. 2020. V. 225. P. 117276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117276
  18. 18. Kellerman D.G., Kalinkin M.O., Abashev R.M. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 22. P. 27632. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp05185c
  19. 19. Kalinkin M.O., Akulov D.A., Medvedeva N.I. et al. // Mater. Today Com. 2022. V. 31. P. 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103346
  20. 20. Modak P., Modak B. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 22. P. 16244. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP02425B
  21. 21. Kellerman D.G., Medvedeva N.I., Kalinkin M.O. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2018. V. 766. P. 626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.328
  22. 22. Kalinkin M.O., Abashev R.M., Zabolotskaya E.V. et al. // Mater Res. Express. 2019. V. 6. P. 046206. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aafd3e
  23. 23. Peng Y.M., Su Y.-K., Yang R.-Y. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2013. V. 48. P. 1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.01.039
  24. 24. Su Y.-K., Peng Y.M., Yang R.-Y., Chen J.-L. // Opt. Mater. 2012. V. P. 1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2012.03.019
  25. 25. Kresse G., Joubert D. // Phys. Rev. B. 1999. V. 59. P. 1758. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
  26. 26. Kresse G., Furthmuller J. // Phys. Rev. B. 1996. V. 54. P. 11169. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
  27. 27. Perdew J.P., Burke S., Ernzerhof M. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996. V. 77. P. 3865. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
  28. 28. Monkhorst H.J., Pack J.D. // Phys. Rev. B: Solid State. 1976. V. 13. P. 5188. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
  29. 29. Ben Yahia H., Shikano M., Takeuch T. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014. V. 2. P. 5858. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta15264b
  30. 30. Berger T., Hajek M. // Radiat. Measur. 2008. V. 43. P. 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.10.029
  31. 31. Kumar V., Nagarajan R. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2012. V. 530. P. 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2012.02.021
  32. 32. Hanic F., Handlovic M., Burdova K., Majling J. // J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res. 1982. V. 12. P. 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01161009
  33. 33. Zimina G.V., Tsygankova M., Sadykova M. et al. // MRS Advances. 2018. V. 3. P. 1309. https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2017.622
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library