Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane on Oxide-Supported Vanadium Phosphorus Oxide Catalysts

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X22600918-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X22600918
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
E. Yu. Mironova
  • Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State Institute of Technology
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 1
Pages
96-104
Abstract
Comparative results of studying the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane (ODE) on catalytic vanadium-phosphorus oxide systems deposited by the molecular layering method on the surface of oxide supports (Al2O3, SiO2) have been presented. It has been found that the highest activity in ODE and selectivity for ethylene are exhibited by vanadium-phosphorus-containing catalysts. The influence of the acidity of catalytic systems on the activity and selectivity of the process has been revealed. The selectivity of the ODE process for ethylene reaches 90%. An increase in the oxygen concentration in the initial mixture from 3.5 to 20% leads mainly to a decrease in the selectivity of the ODE process with respect to the ethylene yield.
Keywords
окислительное дегидрирование этан этилен ванадий-фосфороксидные системы молекулярное наслаивание
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Lopez-Nieto J.M., Botella P., Vazquez M.I. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2002. V. 17. P. 1906. https://doi.org/10.1039/B204037A
  2. 2. Fattahi M., Kazemeini M., Khorasheh F. et al. // Chem. Eng. Technol. 2013. V. 36. № 10. P. 1691. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201300148
  3. 3. Gärtner C.A., van Veen A.C., Lercher J.A. // ChemCatChem. 2013. V. 5. P. 3196. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201200966
  4. 4. Heracleous E., Lemonidou A.A. // J. Catal. 2006. V. 237. № 1. P. 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.11.002
  5. 5. Lazareva E.V., Bondareva V.M., Svintsitskiy D.A. et al. // Catal. Today. 2021. V. 361. P. 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.12.029
  6. 6. Chu B., Truter L., Nijhuis T.A. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2015. V. 498. P. 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.039
  7. 7. Fazlinezhad A., Naeimi A., Yasari E. // Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2019. V. 146. P. 427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.04.028
  8. 8. Mishanin I.I., Bogdan V.I. // Mendeleev Commun. 2019. V. 29. P. 455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2019.07.034
  9. 9. Kucherov A.V., Finashina E.D., Kustov L.M. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2020. V. 30. P. 657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2020.09.035
  10. 10. Chu B., An H., Chen X. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2016. V. 524. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.05.026
  11. 11. Ermilova M., Kucherov A., Orekhova N. et al. // Chem. Eng. Process. 2018. V. 126. P. 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.02.011
  12. 12. Savova B., Loridant S., Filkova D. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2010. V. 390. P. 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.10.004
  13. 13. Solsona B., Concepciyn P., Demicol B. et al. // J. Catal. 2012. V. 295. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2012.07.028
  14. 14. Zhu H., Dong H., Laveille P. et al. // Catal. Today. 2014. V. 228. P. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.061
  15. 15. Sanchis R., Delgado D., Agouram S. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2017. V. 536. P. 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2017.02.012
  16. 16. Boukhlouf H., Barama A., Benrabaa R. et al. // C.R. Chim. 2017. V. 20. P. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2016.02.016
  17. 17. Zhang Z., Ding J., Chai R. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2018. V. 550. P. 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2017.11.005
  18. 18. Solsona B., Zazhigalov V.A., López Nieto J.M. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2003. V. 249. P. 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X (03)00178-9
  19. 19. Lisi L., Ruoppolo G., Casaletto M.P. et al. // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005. V. 232. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2005.01.035
  20. 20. Vedrine J.C., Hutchings G.J., Kiely C.J. // Catal. Today. 2013. V. 217. P. 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.01.004
  21. 21. Ivars-Barceló F., Hutchings G.J., Bartley J.K. et al. // J. Catal. 2017. V. 354. P. 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2017.08.020
  22. 22. Haddad N., Bordes-Richard E., Barama A. // Catal. Today. 2009. V. 142. P. 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.09.015
  23. 23. Mikhailovskii S.V., Chernov A.S., Mironova E.Yu. et al. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2014. V. 87. № 1. P. 23. [Михайловский С.В., Чернов А.С., Миронова Е.Ю. и др. // Журн. прикл. химии. 2014. Т. 87. № 1. С. 26.]https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427214010030
  24. 24. Sosnov E.A., Malkov A.A., Malygin A.A. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2021. V. 94. P. 1189. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427221090020
  25. 25. Дроздов Е.О., Дубровенский С.Д., Малыгин А.А. // Журн. общ. химии. 2020. Т. 90. № 5. С. 795. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044460X20050212
  26. 26. Захарова Н.В., Аккулева К.Т., Малыгин А.А. // Журн. общ. химии. 2020. Т. 90. № 9. С. 1414. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044460X20090139
  27. 27. Zhilyaeva N.A., Ermilova M.M., Orekhova N.V. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2018. V. 54. № 11. P. 1136. [Жиляева Н.А., Ермилова М.М., Орехова Н.В. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2018. Т. 54. № 11. С. 1202.]https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851811016X
  28. 28. Mikhailovskii S.V., Zhilyaeva N.A., Obletsova A.A. et al. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2016. V. 89. № 1. P. 34. [Михайловский С.В., Жиляева Н.А., Облецова А.А. и др. // Журн. прикл. химии. 2016. Т. 89. № 1. С. 37.]https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427216010055
  29. 29. Wang Sh., Murata K., Hayakawa T. et al. // Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2000. V. 130. P. 1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991 (00)80467-X
  30. 30. Peng X., Zhu J., Yao L. et al. // J. Energy Chem. 2013. V. 22. P. 653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-4956 (13)60086-8
  31. 31. Botavina M.A., Martra G., Agafonov Yu.A. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2008. V. 347. P. 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.05.037
  32. 32. Ates A., Hardacre Ch., Goguet A. // Appl. Catal. A. 2012. V. 441–442. P. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.06.038
  33. 33. Zhu J., Qin S., Ren S. et al. // Catal. Today. 2009. V. 148. P. 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.07.074
  34. 34. Casaletto M.P., Lisi L., Mattogno G. et al. // Surf. Interface Anal. 2004. V. 36. P. 737. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1751
  35. 35. Le Bars J., Vedrine J.C., Auroux A. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 1992. V. 88. № 2. P. 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-860X (92)80214-W
  36. 36. Grabowski R., Słoczynski J. // Chem. Eng. Process. 2005. V. 44. P. 1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2005.03.002
  37. 37. Klisinska A., Samson K., Gressel I. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2006. V. 309. P. 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2006.04.028
  38. 38. Zhilyaeva N.A., Mironova E.Yu., Ermilova M.M. et al. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018. V. 195. P. 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.011
  39. 39. Volkov A.O., Golubenko D.V., Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021. V. 254. P. 117562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117562
  40. 40. Nguyen T.-D., Do T.-O. // Langmuir. 2009. V. 25. № 9. P. 5322. https://doi.org/10.1021/la804073a
  41. 41. Uskokovic V. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 22. P. 5531. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP06529F
  42. 42. Harju P.H., Pasek E.A. Pat. 4374756 US: Filed 09.09.1981: Granted 22.02.1983
  43. 43. Cavani F., Trifiro F. // ChemInform. 1994. V. 25. № 34. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.199434086
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library