RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

SOLUTION SYNTHESIS FROM VARIOUS PRECURSORS OF MAGNESIUM PHOSPHATE-BASED POWDER MATERIALS FOR STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC 3D PRINTING

PII
S3034560X25100063-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034560X25100063
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 10
Pages
1284-1294
Abstract
Powders Mg(PO)·22HO, MgHPO·3HO, NaMg(PO)·xHO, NHMgPO·6HO from different salts, magnesium oxide and phosphoric acid were synthesized by precipitation from solutions at 25°C. Depending on the precursors, products of different compositions were obtained at a specified pH = 9, they were characterized using X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, and static light scattering. The selection of the sintering mode for the printed sample was carried out using TG and DTA to determine the temperature intervals at which the organic component of the printing suspension was removed. The fundamental possibility of obtaining porous ceramics by 3D printing from magnesium orthophosphate obtained by the solution method with an average size of agglomerates of 28.3 μm and Kelvin structure has been shown. This opens up prospects for the use of magnesium phosphate-based ceramics, in particular magnesium orthophosphate, in regenerative medicine.
Keywords
магниевые фосфаты биорезорбируемая керамика аддитивные технологии
Date of publication
01.10.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
60

References

  1. 1. Langer R. // Mol. Therapy. 2000. V. 1. № 1. P. 12. https://doi.org/10.1006/mthe.1999.0003
  2. 2. Laurencin C.T., Ambrosio A.M.A., Borden M.D. et al. // Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1999. V. 1. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.19
  3. 3. Eshraghi S., Das S. // Acta Biomaterialia. 2010. V. 6. P. 2467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.002
  4. 4. Kolk A., Handschel J., Drescher W. et al. // J. Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 2012. V. 40. P. 706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.002
  5. 5. Vorndam E., Moseke C., Gbureck U. // Mater. Res. Soc. 2015. V. 40. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1557/MRS.2015.326
  6. 6. Ievlev V.M., Putlyaev V.I., Safronova T.V. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2015. V. 51. № 13. P. 1297. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168515130038
  7. 7. Ларионов Д.С., Кузина М.А., Евдокимов П.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 3. С. 309. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X20030071
  8. 8. Juhasz J.A., Best S.M. // J. Mater. Sci. 2012. V. 47. P. 610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6063-x
  9. 9. Chernousova S., Epple M. // Adv. Biomater. Devices Medicine. 2014. V. 1. P. 74.
  10. 10. Vallet-Regl M., González-Calbet J.M. // Prog. Solid State Chem. 2004. V. 32. № 1–2. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.07.001
  11. 11. Uskokovic V., Uskokovic D.P. // J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B: Appl. Biomater. 2011. V. 96. № 1. P. 152. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31746
  12. 12. Neumann M., Epple M. // Eur. J. Trauma. 2006. V. 32. № 2. P. 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-006-6044-y
  13. 13. Tadic D., Epple M. // Biomaterials. 2004. V. 25. № 6. P. 987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612 (03)00621-5
  14. 14. Sader M.S., Legeros R.Z., Soares G.A. // J. Mater. Sci. — Mater. Med. 2009. V. 20. № 2. P. 521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3610-3
  15. 15. Baker S.B., Worthley L.I. // Critical Care Resuscitation. 2002. V. 4. № 4. P. 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-2772 (23)01193-6
  16. 16. Sikder P., Grice C.R., Bhaduri S.B. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019. V. 374. P. 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.007
  17. 17. Zyman Z., Tkachenko M., Epple M. et al. // Mater. wiss. Werkst. tech. 2006. V. 37. № 6. P. 474. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.200600022
  18. 18. Preobrazhenskiy I.I., Klimashina E.S., Filippov Y.Y. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2024. V. 60. № 12. P. 1391. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168524701620
  19. 19. Preobrazhenskiy I.I., Deyneko D.V., Murashko A.M. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2025. V. 35. № 5. P. 614. https://doi.org/10.71267/mencom.7716
  20. 20. Taylor A.W., Frazier A.W., Gurney E.L. // Trans. Faraday Soc. 1963. V. 59. P. 1580. https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9635901580
  21. 21. Brown P.W., Gulick J., Dumm J.Q. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2005. V. 76. P. 1558. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1151-2916.1993.TB03939.X
  22. 22. Shpunt S., Belposky A., Shulgina M. // Appl. Chem. 1951. V. 24. P. 439.
  23. 23. Karageorgiou V., Kaplan D. // Biomaterials. 2005. V. 26. № 27. P. 5474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
  24. 24. Khalaf A.T., Wei Y., Wan J. et al. // Life. 2022. V. 12. № 6. P. 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060903
  25. 25. Melchels F.P.W., Fejen J., Grijpma D.W. // Biomaterials. 2010. V. 31. № 24. P. 6121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
  26. 26. Thomson W. // Philosophical Magazine Series 5. 1887. V. 24. № 151. P. 503. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786448708628135
  27. 27. Mestres G., Abdolhosseini M., Bowles W. et al. // Acta Biomater. 2013. V. 9. № 9. P. 8384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.032
  28. 28. Hongyan M., Bwan X. // Mater. Des. 2017. V. 118. P. 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.012
  29. 29. Андрианова Е.Н., Демидова Е.Л., Алешин В.А. Неорганическая химия. Практикум / Под ред. Шевелькова А.В., Лаборатория знаний, Москва, 2021. 478 с.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library