RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

APPLICATION OF METAL ALKOXOACETYLACETONATES IN PREPARATION OF ELECTROCHROMIC FILMS BASED ON NICKEL-DOPED VO

PII
S0044457X25070148-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X25070148
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 7
Pages
979-986
Abstract
Vanadyl and nickel alkoxoacetylacetonates were used to prepare vanadium pentaxide films doped with 1, 3, and 10 mol % nickel oxide. All films crystallized in tetragonal β-VO modification. The materials are strongly textured along the (200) axis and formed from one-dimensional structures, however, at 3 and 10 mol % NiO content, nanoparticles of 30–50 nm size are also observed in addition to them. According to the results of Raman spectroscopy, the materials contain a noticeable amount of V ions, but no traces of NiO phases were found. All obtained materials, in terms of electrochromic properties are cathodic, changing color during reduction to dark blue, and during oxidation — to more transparent yellow. At the same time, an increase in nickel content leads to a decrease in coloring efficiency and slowing down of electrochromic processes. The results of the study allow us to conclude that it is promising to use materials based on VO doped with nickel, obtained with the use of metal alkoxoacetylacetonates as precursors, as components of electrochromic devices.
Keywords
оксид ванадия оксид никеля электрохромизм алкоксоацетилацетонат электрохромные материалы
Date of publication
10.05.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
13

References

  1. 1. Mortimer R.J. // Annu Rev. Mater. Res. 2011. V. 41. № 1. P. 241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100344
  2. 2. Awendafis E., Berggren L., Niklasson G.A. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 2006. V. 496. № 1. P. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.183
  3. 3. Grangvist C.G., Arvizu M.A., Qu H.Y. et al. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019. V. 357. P. 619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.048
  4. 4. Grangvist C.G. // Thin Solid Films. 2014. V. 564. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.002
  5. 5. Gillaspie D.T., Tenent R.C., Dillon A.C. // J. Mater. Chem. 2010. V. 20. № 43. P. 9585. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm00604a
  6. 6. Mortimer R.J., Dyer A.L., Reynolds J.R. // Displays. 2006. V. 27. № 1. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2005.03.003
  7. 7. Gu C., Jia A.B., Zhang Y.M. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2022. V. 122. № 18. P. 14679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01055
  8. 8. Grangvist C.G., Arvizu M.A., Bayrak Pehlivan et al. // Electrochim Acta. 2018. V. 259. P. 1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.169
  9. 9. Zanarini S., Di Lupo F., Bedini A. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C. Mater. 2014. V. 2. № 42. P. 8854. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4t001123f
  10. 10. Cheng K.C., Chen F.R., Kai J.I. // Solar Energy Materials Solar Cells. 2006. V. 90. № 7–8. P. 1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2005.07.006
  11. 11. Scherer M.R.J., Li L., Cunha P.M.S. et al. // Adv. Mat. 2012. V. 24. № 9. P. 1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104272
  12. 12. Jin A., Chen W., Zhu Q. et al. // Electr. Acta. 2010. V. 55. № 22. P. 6408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.047
  13. 13. Costa C., Pinheiro C., Henriques I. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2012. V. 4. № 10. P. 5266. https://doi.org/10.1021/am301213b
  14. 14. Sonavane A.C., Inandar A.I., Shinde P.S. et al. // J. Alloys. Compd. 2010. V. 489. № 2. P. 667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.146
  15. 15. Yoshino T., Kobayashi K., Araki S. et al. // Sol. Energy. Mater. Sol. Cells. 2012. V. 99. P. 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2011.08.024
  16. 16. Wen R T., Niklasson G A., Grannyist C G. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015. V. 7. № 18. P. 9319. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5001715
  17. 17. Liu Q., Chen Q., Zhang Q. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2018. V. 6. № 3. P. 646. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tc04696k
  18. 18. Chen Y., Wang Y., Sun P. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2015. V. 3. № 41. P. 20614. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta04011f
  19. 19. Simonenko E P., Simonenko N P., Kopitsa G P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018. V. 65. P. 691. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618060232
  20. 20. Gorobtsov P Y., Simonenko N P., Simonenko T L. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 69. P. 1580. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023624602277
  21. 21. Topologo O, Guanemoto H I., Mosoyuun A C. u dp. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2024. Т. 69. № 4. С. 624. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.31857/S0044457X24040177
  22. 22. Filonenko V P., Sundberg M., Werner P E. et al. // Acta Crystallogr. B. 2004. V. 60. № 4. P. 375. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768104012881
  23. 23. Talledo A., Valdivia H., Benadorj C. // J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 2003. V. 21. № 4. P. 1494. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1586282
  24. 24. Zou C., Fan L., Chen R. et al. // Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2012. V. 14. № 2. P. 626. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ec06170d
  25. 25. Khlayboomne S T. // Results Phys. 2022. V. 42. P. 106000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.106000
  26. 26. Khlayboomne S T., Thedsakhulwong A. // Mater. Res. Express. 2022. V. 9. P. 076401. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac827a
  27. 27. Asadov A., Mukhtar S., Gao W. // J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 2015. V. 33. P. 041802. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4922628
  28. 28. Ureña-Begara F., Crunteanu A., Raskin J P. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017. V. 403. P. 717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.160
  29. 29. Shvets P., Dikaya O., Maksimova K. et al. // J. Raman Spectr. 2019. V. 50. № 8. P. 1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.5616
  30. 30. Clauws P., Broeck J., Vennik J. // Physica Status Solidi (B) 1985. V. 131. № 2. P. 459. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221310207
  31. 31. Abello L., Husson E., Repelin Y. et al. // Spectrochim. Acta A. 1983. V. 39. P. 641.
  32. 32. Zhou B., He D. // J. Raman Spectr. 2008. V. 39. № 10. P. 1475. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2025
  33. 33. Baddour-Hadjean R., Marzouk A., Pereira-Ramos J. P. // J. Raman Spectr. 2012. V. 43. № 1. P. 153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2984
  34. 34. Schilbe P. // Physica. 2002. V. 316–317. P. 600.
  35. 35. Ji Y., Zhang Y., Gao M. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2014. V. 4. P. 4854. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04854
  36. 36. Meyer J., Zilberberg K., Riedl T. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2011. V. 110. P. 033710. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3611392
  37. 37. Zhang H., Wang S., Sun X. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2017. V. 5. № 4. P. 817. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6t604050k
  38. 38. Peng H., Sun W., Li Y. et al. // Nano. Res. 2016. V. 9. № 10. P. 2960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1181-z
  39. 39. Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko T.L., Simonenko N.P. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022. V. 578. P. 151984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151984
  40. 40. Greiner M T., Helander M.G., Wang Z.-B. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010. V. 114. № 46. P. 19777. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp108281m
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library