Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

ELECTROCHROMIC PROPERTIES OF β-VO FILM AND ITS PREPARATION USING VANADYL ALKOXOACETYLACETONATE

You can
PII
S0044457X25070131-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X25070131
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ph. Yu. Gorobtsov
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 7
Pages
969-978
Abstract
Using alkoxoacetylacetonate vanadyl, a vanadium pentaxide film crystallized as a tetragonal β-VO modification was obtained by dip coating technique. The material is significantly textured along the axis (200) and is formed of one-dimensional structures with an aspect ratio of no less than 10, some of which are consolidated into agglomerates within which the particles are touching with long faces. According to the results of Raman spectroscopy and the value of electron work function for the film surface (4.63 eV), measured by KPFM, the oxide contains a noticeable amount of V. The obtained material, from the electrochromic properties point of view, is anodic, changing color during reduction to pale blue, and during oxidation — to less transparent yellow-orange. The optical contrast reaches 27% in the blue part of the visible spectrum. The results of the study allow us to conclude that β-VO-based materials obtained using alkoxoacetylacetonate vanadyl are promising for use as a component of electrochromic devices.
Keywords
оксид ванадия пентаоксид ванадия электрохромизм алкоксоацетилацетонат электрохромные материалы
Date of publication
08.05.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
15

References

  1. 1. Devthade V., Lee S. // J. Appl. Phys. 2020. V. 128. № 23. P. 231101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0027690
  2. 2. Yao J., Li Y., Massé R.C. et al. // Energy Storage Mater. 2018. V. 11. P. 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.10.014
  3. 3. Yue Y., Liang H. // Adv. Energy. Mater. 2017. V. 7. № 17. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602545
  4. 4. Enjalbert R., Galy J. // Acta Crystallog. 1986. V. 42. № 11. P. 1467. https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1971.133.133.75
  5. 5. Kumar M., Kim Y., Lee H.H. // Cur. Appl.Phys. 2021. V. 30. P. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2021.09.011
  6. 6. Wu C., Xie Y. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2010. V. 3. № 9. P. 1191. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00026d
  7. 7. Liu M., Su B., Tang Y. et al. // Adv. Energy. Mater. 2017. V. 7. № 23. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700885
  8. 8. Wachs I.E. // Dalton Transactions. 2013. V. 42. № 33. P. 11762. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3dt50692d
  9. 9. Hu P., Hu P., Yu T.D. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2023. V. 123. № 8. P. 4353. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2000546
  10. 10. Tan H.T., Rui X., Sun W. et al. // Nanoscale. 2015. V. 7. № 35. P. 14595. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr04126k
  11. 11. Zhang N., Dong Y., Jia M. et al. // ACS Energy Lett. 2018. V. 3. № 6. P. 1366. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00565
  12. 12. Mattelaer F., Geryl K., Rampelberg G. et al. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. № 115. P. 114658. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA257A2a
  13. 13. Liu F., Chen Z., Fang G. et al. // Nanomicro. Lett. 2019. V. 11. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0256-2
  14. 14. Wang Y., Lubbers T., Xia R. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021. V. 168. № 2. P. 020507. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abdef2
  15. 15. Khan Z., Singh P., Ansari S.A. et al. // Small. 2021. V. 17. № 4. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202006651
  16. 16. Majumdar D., Mandal M., Bhattacharya S.K. // Chem. Electro. Chem. 2019. V. 6. № 6. P. 1623. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201801761
  17. 17. Foo C.Y., Sumboja A., Tan D.J.H. et al. // Adv. Energy. Mater. 2014. V. 4. № 12. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201400236
  18. 18. Narayanan R. // J. Solid State Chem. 2017. V. 253. № May. P. 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2017.05.035
  19. 19. Granqvist C.G. // Thin Solid Films. 2014. V. 564. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.002
  20. 20. Mortimer R.J. // Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2011. V. 41. № 1. P. 241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100344
  21. 21. Mortimer R.J., Dyer A.L., Reynolds J.R. // Displays. 2006. V. 27. № 1. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2005.03.003
  22. 22. Gu C., Jia A.B., Zhang Y.M. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2022. V. 122. № 18. P. 14679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1601055
  23. 23. Granqvist C.G., Arvizu M.A., Qu H.Y. et al. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019. V. 357. P. 619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.048
  24. 24. Granqvist C.G., Arvizu M.A., Bayrak Pehlivan et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2018. V. 259. P. 1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.169
  25. 25. Vernardou D. // Coatings. 2017. V. 7. № 2. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings7020024
  26. 26. Iida Y., Kaneko Y., Kanno Y. // J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008. V. 197. № 1–3. P. 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.032
  27. 27. Tong Z., Hao J., Zhang K. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2014. V. 2. № 18. P. 3651. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tc32417f
  28. 28. Zanarini S., Di Lupo F., Bedini A. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2014. V. 2. № 42. P. 8854. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tc01123f
  29. 29. Gorobtsov P.Y., Simonenko N.P., Simonenko T.L. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 69. P. 1580. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023624602277
  30. 30. Topodogo O.O., Cunomenko H.I., Mokpyuan A.C. u op. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2024. Т. 69. № 4. С. 624. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X24040177
  31. 31. Jin A., Chen W., Zhu Q. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2010. V. 55. № 22. P. 6408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.047
  32. 32. Jeyalakshmi K., Vijayakumar S., Nagamuthu S. et al. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2013. V. 48. № 2. P. 760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.054
  33. 33. Asadov A., Mukhtar S., Gao W. // J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B. 2015. V. 33. № 4. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4922628
  34. 34. Khlayboomme S.T., Thedsakhuhwong A. // Mater. Res. Express. 2022. V. 9. № 7. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac827a
  35. 35. Khlayboomme S.T. // Results. Phys. 2022. V. 42. P. 106000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rimp.2022.106000
  36. 36. Filonenko V.P., Sundberg M., Werner P.E. et al. // Acta Crystallogr. B. 2004. V. 60. № 4. P. 375. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768104012881
  37. 37. Talledo A., Valdivia H., Benadori C. // J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 2003. V. 21. № 4. P. 1494. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1586282
  38. 38. Zou C., Fan L., Chen R. et al. // Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2012. V. 14. № 2. P. 626. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ce06170d
  39. 39. Shvets P., Dikaya O., Maksimova K. et al. // J. Raman Spectr. 2019. V. 50. № 8. P. 1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.5616
  40. 40. Urena-Begara F., Cranneanu A., Raskin J.P. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017. V. 403. P. 717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.160
  41. 41. Clausus P., Broeckx J., Vennik J. // Physica Status Solidi (B). 1985. V. 131. № 2. P. 459. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221310207
  42. 42. Abello L., Husson E., Repelin Y. et al. // Spectrochim. Acta A. 1983. V. 39. P. 641.
  43. 43. Zhou B., He D. // J. Raman Spectr. 2008. V. 39. № 10. P. 1475. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2025
  44. 44. Baddour-Hadjcan R., Marzouk A., Pereira-Ramos J.P. // J. Raman Spectr. 2012. V. 43. № 1. P. 153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2984
  45. 45. Schilbe P. // Physica B. 2002. V. 316–317. P. 600.
  46. 46. Ji Y., Zhang Y., Gao M. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2014. V. 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04854
  47. 47. Meyer J., Zilberberg K., Riedl T. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2011. V. 110. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3611392
  48. 48. Zhang H., Wang S., Sun X. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C. Mater. 2017. V. 5. № 4. P. 817. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tcd4050k
  49. 49. Choi S.G., Seok H.J., Rhee S. et al. // J. Alloys. Compd. 2021. V. 878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160303
  50. 50. Peng H., Sun W., Li Y. et al. // Nano. Res. 2016. V. 9. № 10. P. 2960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1181-z
  51. 51. Gorobtsov P.Yu., Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko T.L. et al. // Materials. 2022. V. 15. № 21. P. 7837. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217837
  52. 52. Cholant C.M., Westphal T.M., Balboni R.D.C. et al. // J. Sol. State Electrochem. 2017. V. 21. № 5. P. 1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-016-3491-1
  53. 53. Patil C.E., Tarwal N.L., Jadhav P.R. et al. // Cur. Appl. Physics. 2014. V. 14. № 3. P. 389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2013.12.014
  54. 54. Panagopoulou M., Vernardou D., Koudounas E. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2019. V. 321. P. 134743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134743
  55. 55. Panagopoulou M., Vernardou D., Koudounas E. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. 2017. V. 121. № 1. P. 70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09018
  56. 56. Jin A., Chen W., Zhu Q. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 2009. V. 517. № 6. P. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.001
  57. 57. Mjeiri I., Gaudon M., Rougier A. // Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2019. V. 198. № December 2018. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.04.010
  58. 58. Sajitha S., Aparna U., Deb B. // Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2019. V. 6. № 21. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201901038
  59. 59. Surca A.K., Drazic G., Mihelcik M. // Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2019. V. 196. P. 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.017
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library