Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

SYNTHESIS OF HIGH ELECTROCONDUCTIVE ZnO/CNT NANOCOMPOSITES WITH CHEMORESISTIVE RESPONSE AT ROOM TEMPERATURE

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X24120195-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24120195
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. S Mokrushin
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
M. V. Kozlova
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 12
Pages
1872-1881
Abstract
ZnO/CNT nanocomposites with CNT content from 0.01 to 10 wt.% were prepared using solvothermal synthesis. The thermal behavior of the obtained composites was studied at heating up to 850℃ using DSC/TGA. The phase composition was studied using XRD and Raman spectroscopy and the formation of hexagonal wurtzite phase was established. According to SEM data, zinc oxide nanoparticles are localized on the CNT surface. The temperature dependence of electrical resistance of ZnO/CNT nanocomposites was studied. It is shown that semiconductor or metallic type of conductivity is observed depending on the CNT content. The chemoresistive responses to a wide range of gases were studied at room temperature, the best sensitivity was shown by the sample with the lowest CNT content (0.01 wt. %).
Keywords
газовый сенсор оксид цинка (ZnO) углеродные нанотрубки (УНТ) нанокомпозит
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
15

References

  1. 1. McAleer J.F., Moseley P.T., Norris J.O.W. et al. // J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans 1: Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases. 1987. V. 83. № 4. P. 1323. https://doi.org/10.1039/f19878301323
  2. 2. Morrison S.R. // Sensors and Actuators. 1981. V. 2. P. 329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0250-6874 (81)80054-6
  3. 3. Heiland G. // Sens. Actuators. 1981. V. 2. P. 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0250-6874 (81)80055-8
  4. 4. Rigoni F., Tognolini S., Borghetti P. et al. // Analyst. 2013. V. 138. № 24. P. 7392. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an01209c
  5. 5. Schedin F., Geim A.K., Morozov S.V. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2007. V. 6. № 9. P. 652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1967
  6. 6. Olorunkosebi A.A., Olumurewa K.O., Fasakin O. et al. // RSC Adv. 2023. V. 13. № 24. P. 16630. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA01684F
  7. 7. Toda K., Furue R., Hayami S. // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2015. V. 878. P. 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.002
  8. 8. Kim S.J., Koh H.-J., Ren C.E. et al. // ACS Nano. 2018. V. 12. № 2. P. 986. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b07460
  9. 9. Wang F., Yang C., Duan C. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015. V. 162. № 1. P. B16. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0371501jes
  10. 10. Junkaew A., Arroyave R. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018. V. 20. № 9. P. 6073. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP08622A
  11. 11. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Gorobtsov P.Y. et al. // Chemosensors. 2022. V. 11. № 1. P. 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11010013
  12. 12. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Averin A.A. et al. // Chemosensors. 2023. V. 11. № 2. P. 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11020142
  13. 13. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 5. P. 705. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622050187
  14. 14. Wang J., Zeng W., Zhou Q. // Front. Chem. 2022. V. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.950974
  15. 15. Li L., Yu M., Gao C. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2024. V. 1003. P. 175530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175530
  16. 16. Samawi K.A., Abdulrazzaq S.J., Zorah M. et al. // J. Solid State Chem. 2024. V. 334. P. 124690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2024.124690
  17. 17. Lama S., Choi H.-S., Ramesh S. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2024. V. 14. № 1. P. 11605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56354-1
  18. 18. Luo K., Peng H., Zhang B. et al. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024. V. 518. P. 216049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216049
  19. 19. Zamansky K.K., Fedorov F.S., Shandakov S.D. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2024. V. 417. P. 136116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.136116
  20. 20. Struchkov N.S., Romashkin A.V., Rabchinskii M.K. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2024. V. 417. P. 136088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.136088
  21. 21. Xie T., Li F., Song P. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2024. V. 1002. P. 175271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175271
  22. 22. Li Q., He R., Feng F. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2024. V. 413. P. 135863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.135863
  23. 23. Dariyal P., Sharma S., Chauhan G.S. et al. // Nanoscale Adv. 2021. V. 3. № 23. P. 6514. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NA00707F
  24. 24. Xu K., Fu C., Gao Z. et al. // Instrum. Sci. Technol. 2018. V. 46. № 2. P. 115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2017.1340896
  25. 25. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Gorban Y.M. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2023. V. 49. № 11. P. 17600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.126
  26. 26. Nagornov I.A., Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko E.P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 4. P. 539. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622040143
  27. 27. Kong J., Franklin N.R., Zhou C. et al. // Science (80-.). 2000. V. 287. № 5453. P. 622. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5453.622
  28. 28. Li J., Lu Y., Ye Q. et al. // Nano Lett. 2003. V. 3. № 7. P. 929. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl034220x
  29. 29. Jeong S., Kim J., Lee J. // Adv. Mater. 2020. V. 32. № 51. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002075
  30. 30. Verssimo M.I.S. // TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024. V. 178. P. 117813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117813
  31. 31. Norizan M.N., Moklis M.H., Ngah Demon S.Z. et al. // RSC Adv. 2020. V. 10. № 71. P. 43704. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA09438B
  32. 32. Mokrushin A.S., Gorban Y.M., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 12. P. 2099. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622601520
  33. 33. Lucci M., Regoliosi P., Reale A. et al. // Sens. Actuators B. 2005. V 111-112. P 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.06.033
  34. 34. Mercuri F., Sgamellotti A., Valentini L. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005. V. 109. № 27. P. 13175. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0507290
  35. 35. Марикуца А.В., Воробьева Н.А., Румянцева М.Н. // Изв. АН. Сер. химическая. 2017. Т. 10. С. 1728. https://doi.org/1026-3500
  36. 36. Kauffman D.R., Star A. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008. V. 47. № 35. P. 6550. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200704488
  37. 37. Мокрушин А.С., Симоненко Н.П., Симоненко Т.Л. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. V. 66. № 9. P. 1336. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X21090063
  38. 38. Li J., Zhang C., QuG. et al. // Talanta. 2024. V. 273. P. 125853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2024.125853
  39. 39. Nami M., Taheri M., Deen I.A. et al. // TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024. V. 174. P. 117664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117664
  40. 40. Gamboa A., Fernandes E.C. // Sens. Actuators A. 2024. V. 366. P. 115013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115013
  41. 41. Kumar D., Chaturvedi P., Saho P. et al. // Sens. Actuators B. 2017. V. 240. P. 1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.095
  42. 42. Tian T., Yin H., Zhang L. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023. V. 609. P. 155357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155357
  43. 43. Lone M.Y., Kumar A., Husain S. et al. // Physica E: Low-dimensional Syst. Nanostructures. 2017. V. 87. P. 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.10.049
  44. 44. Xiao Z., Kong L.B., Ruan S. et al. // Sens. Actuators B. 2018. V. 274. P. 235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.040
  45. 45. Zaporotskova I.V., Boroznina N.P., Parkhomenko Y.N. et al. // Mater. Electron. Eng. 2018. V. 20. № 1. P. 5. https://doi.org/10.17073/1609-3577-2017-1-5-21
  46. 46. Young S.-J., Liu Y.-H., Lin Z.-D. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020. V. 167. № 16. P. 167519. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abd1be
  47. 47. Belchi R., Pibaleau B., Pinault M. et al. // Mater. Adv. 2020. V. 1. № 5. P. 1232. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA00204F
  48. 48. Yang M., Gong Y., Shen G. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2021. V. 283. P. 128733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128733
  49. 49. Schutt F., Postica V., Adelung R. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. V. 9. № 27. P. 23107. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b03702
  50. 50. Sinha M., Neogi S., Mahapatra R. et al. // Sens. Actuators B. 2021. V. 336. P. 129729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129729
  51. 51. Park S., Byoun Y., Kang H. et al. // ACS Omega. 2019. V. 4. № 6. P. 10677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00773
  52. 52. Zhang D., Sun Y., Zhang Y. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015. V. 26. № 10. P. 7445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-3378-4
  53. 53. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017. V. 62. № 11. P. 1415. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023617110195
  54. 54. Nagornov I.A., Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko E.P. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2020. V. 46. № 6. P. 7756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.279
  55. 55. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018. V. 63. № 11. P. 1519. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618110189
  56. 56. Simonenko E.P., Nagornov I.A., Mokrushin A.S. et al. // Micromachines. 2023. V. 14. № 4. P. 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14040725
  57. 57. Fedorov F.S., Simonenko N.P., Trouillet V. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 12. № 50. P. 56135. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c14055
  58. 58. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Simonenko T.L. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022. V. 589. P. 152974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152974
  59. 59. Scepanovic M., Grujic-Brojcin M., Vojisavljevic K. et al. // J. Raman Spectrosc. 2010. V. 41. № 9. P. 914. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2546
  60. 60. Jiang C., Zhao J., Therese H.A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003. V. 107. № 34. P. 8742. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp035371r
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library