Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Influence of synthesis method on morphology and functional properties of li-rich layered oxides

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X24070067-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24070067
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. A. Medvedeva
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 7
Pages
986-998
Abstract
The influence of the precursor synthesis method on the functional properties of cathode material based on lithium-rich oxides was studied. Precursors were obtained by co-precipitation method (hydroxide and carbonate precursors) and solvothermal method (hydroxide and oxalate precursors). Within the selected synthesis methods, the parameters were changed by varying the precipitant and pH of precipitation during the synthesis by co-precipitation method and the reaction medium/precipitant combinations during the solvothermal synthesis method. The solid-phase reaction of the investigated precursors with lithium source and subsequent high-temperature annealing resulted in lithium-rich layered oxides of the composition Li1.2Ni0.133Mn0.534Co0.133O2. The sample synthesized by solvothermal method exhibits high discharge capacity values of 233.2 mAh/g (0.1 C) and 175.3 mAh/g (0.5 C) with residual discharge capacity of 94 and 80.5%, respectively. The samples with comparable electrochemical performance are similar in morphology. These materials are agglomerated and characterized by a bimodal distribution with maxima in the 14–19 μm and 55–60 μm regions. An approach that takes into account the relationship between morphology and electrochemical properties will allow the preparation of higher performance electrode materials for lithium-ion battery.
Keywords
катодные материалы метод синтеза морфология
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
14

References

  1. 1. Masias A., Marcicki J., Paxton W.A. // ACS Energy Lett. 2021. V. 6. № 2. P. 621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02584
  2. 2. Choi D., Shamim N., Crawford A. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2021. V. 511. P. 230419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230419
  3. 3. Malhotra A., Battke B., Beuse M. et al. // Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016. V. 56. P. 705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.085
  4. 4. Nitta N., Wu F., Lee J.T. et al. // Mater. Today. 2015. V. 18. № 5. P. 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040
  5. 5. Murdock B.E., Toghill K.E., Tapia‐Ruiz N. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2021. V. 11. № 39. P. 2102028. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102028
  6. 6. Ji X., Xia Q., Xu Y. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2021. V. 487. P. 229362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229362
  7. 7. Shukla A.K., Ramasse Q.M., Ophus C. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2015. V. 6. № 1. P. 8711. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9711
  8. 8. Genevois C., Koga H., Croguennec L. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. С. 2015. V. 119. № 1. P. 75. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509388j
  9. 9. Viji M., Budumuru A.K., Hebbar V. et al. // Energy Fuels. 2021. V. 35. № 5. P. 4533. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04061
  10. 10. Guo L., Tan X., Mao D. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2021. V. 370. P. 137808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137808
  11. 11. Bian X., Zhang R., Yang X. // Inorg. Chem. 2020. V. 59. № 23. P. 17535. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02766
  12. 12. Song B., Liu Z., Lai M.O. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012. V. 14. № 37. P. 12875. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp42068f
  13. 13. Hu E., Yu X., Lin R. et al. // Nat. Energy. 2018. V. 3. № 8. P. 690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0207-z
  14. 14. Zheng H., Han X., Guo W. et al. // Mater. Today Energy. 2020. V. 18. P. 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100518
  15. 15. Fell C.R., Qian D., Carroll K.J. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2013. V. 25. № 9. P. 1621. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm4000119
  16. 16. Lei Y., Ni J., Hu Z. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2020. V. 10. № 41. P. 2002506. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002506
  17. 17. Медведева А.Е., Махонина Е.В., Печень Л.С. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. V. 67. № 7. P. 896.
  18. 18. Печень Л.С., Махонина Е.В., Медведева А.Е. и др. // Докл. АН. Сер. Химия, науки о материалах. 2022. Т. 502. С. 66.
  19. 19. Печень Л.С., Махонина Е.В., Медведева А.Е. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2022. Т. 58. № 10. С. 1069.
  20. 20. Fu F., Tang J., Yao Y. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016. V. 8. № 39. P. 25654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b09118
  21. 21. Li H., Wei X., Yang P. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2018. V. 261. P. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.119
  22. 22. Fu F., Huang Y., Wu P. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2015. V. 618. P. 673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.191
  23. 23. Li H., Ren Y., Yang P. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2019. V. 297. P. 406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.195
  24. 24. Luo W. // J. Alloys Compd. 2015. V. 636. P. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.163
  25. 25. Chen L., Su Y., Chen S. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2014. V. 26. № 39. P. 6756. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201402541
  26. 26. Yu R., Zhang X., Liu T. et al. // ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017. V. 5. № 10. P. 8970. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01773
  27. 27. Kurilenko K.A., Shlyakhtin O.A., Brylev O.A. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2015. V. 152. P. 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.045
  28. 28. Ramesha R.N., Dasari Bosubabu, Karthick Babu M.G. et al. // ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020. V. 3. № 11. P. 10872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c01897
  29. 29. Pechen L., Makhonina E., Medvedeva A. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. № 22. P. 4054. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12224054
  30. 30. Pechen L.S., Makhonina E.V., Medvedeva A.E. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 5. P. 777. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621050144
  31. 31. Kleiner K., Strehle B., Baker A.R. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2018. V. 30. № 11. P. 3656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00163
  32. 32. Strehle B., Kleiner K., Jung R. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017. V. 164. № 2. P. A400. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1001702jes
  33. 33. Phillips P.J., Bareño J., Li Y. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2015. V. 5. № 23. P. 1501252. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501252
  34. 34. Shen S., Hong Y., Zhu F. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. V. 10. № 15. P. 12666. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b00919
  35. 35. Thackeray M.M., Kang S.-H., Johnson C.S. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2007. V. 17. № 30. P. 3112. https://doi.org/10.1039/b702425h
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library