RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Structure and photocatalytic activity of composites of semiconducting nanoparticles in polymethylmethacrylate

PII
10.31857/S0044457X24060153-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X24060153
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 6
Pages
928-934
Abstract
We fabricated and studied composites made of titania (TiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) or graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanoparticles (20–100 nm) in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Nanodispersed powders of these semiconductors were mixed with mechanically grinded PMMA at a weight ratio ranging from 1 : 5 to 1 : 20. The mixture was dissolved in acetone and deposited on to the surface of water. Upon solidification and drying in air porous discs as thick as 50–200 μm were formed. They were found to have a mechanical durability at the semiconductor to PMMA ratio above 1 : 20. Scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, x-ray difractomenry of the samples demonstrated that semiconducting nanoparticles are quasiuniformly distributed in the polymer matrix. Their crystal structure, the particle size and the composition do not change in comparison to those before synthesis of the composites. Photocatalytic activity of the synthesized composites estimated by decolarization of water solution of the test dye (methylene blue) under UV irradiation was found to be reduced in the sequence TiO2, g-C3N4, ZnO.
Keywords
наночастицы TiO2 ZnO g-C3N4 полиметилметакрилат композит фотокатализ
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
15

References

  1. 1. Aleksandra B.D., Yanling He, Alan M.C.Ng // APL Mater. 2020. V. 8. № 3. P. 030903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140497
  2. 2. Uribe-Lopez M.C., Hidalgo-Lopez M.C., Lopez-Gonzalez R. et al. // J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2021. V. 404. P. 112866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112866
  3. 3. Muhammad Azam Qamar, Mohsin Javed, Sammia Shahid et al. // Heliyon. 2023. V. 9. № 1. P. e12685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12685
  4. 4. Xingxing Yang, Yongli Ye, Jiadi Sun et al. // Small. 2022. V. 18. № 9. P. 2105089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202105089
  5. 5. Suprabha Yadav, Anuj Mittal, Shankar Sharma et al. // Semiconductor Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 34. № 5. P. 055008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/ab7776
  6. 6. David James Martin, Kaipei Qiu, Dr. Stephen Andrew Shevlin et al. // Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2014. V. 53. № 35. P. 9240. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201403375
  7. 7. Xueze Chu, Satish C.I, Jae-Hun Yang, Xinwei Guan et al. // Small. 2023. V. 19. № 41. P. 2302875. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202302875
  8. 8. Козлов Д.А., Артамонов К.А., Ревенко А.О. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 5. С. 653. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22050105
  9. 9. Yasuo I. // Coordination Chem. Rev. 2013. V. 257. P. 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.018
  10. 10. Yinghui Wang, Lizhen Liu, Tianyi Ma et al. // Adv. Functional Mater. 2021. V. 31. № 34. P. 2102540. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202102540
  11. 11. Manviri Rani, Uma Shanker // Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Engineer. Aspects. 2018. V. 559. P. 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.040
  12. 12. Sathya S., Sriyutha Murthy P., Gayathri Devi V. et al. // Mater. Sci. Engineer. C. 2019. V. 100. P. 886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.053
  13. 13. Siyu Wang, Xiaohui Dai, Fei Li et al. // J. Porous Mater. 2019. V. 2. P. 465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-019-00828-5
  14. 14. Barabaszová K.Č., Holešová S., Hundáková M. et al. // Polymers. 2020. V. 12. № 12. P. 2811. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122811
  15. 15. Chia-Hung Chao, Chien-Te Hsieh, Wen-Jie Ke et al. // J. Power Sources. 2021. V. 482. № 15. P. 228896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228896
  16. 16. Dandan Qin, Wangyang Lu, Xiyi Wang et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2016. V. 8. № 39. P. 25962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b07680
  17. 17. Aysan Joodi, Somaiyeh Allahyari, Nader Rahemi et al. // Ceramics Int. 2020. V. 46. № 8. P. 11328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.162
  18. 18. Masuda Y. // Scientific Rep. 2020. V. 10. № 1. P. 13499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70525-w
  19. 19. Денисов Н.М., Чубенко Е.Б., Бондаренко В.П. и др. // Письма в ЖТФ. 2019. Т. 45. № 3. С. 49. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785019020068
  20. 20. Chubenko E.B., Baglov A.V., Fedotova Yu.A. et al. // Inorg. Maters. 2021. V. 57. №. 2. P. 136. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168521020059
  21. 21. Baglov A.V., Chubenko E.B., Hnitsko A.A. et al. // Carbon Systems. 2020. V. 54. № 2. P. 228. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063782620020049
  22. 22. Theivasanthi T., Alagar M. // Chemical Physics. 2013. arXiv:1307.1091.
  23. 23. Satyanaratana T., Srinivasa R.K., Nagarjuna G. // Research Article. 2012. V. 2012. P. 372505. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/372505
  24. 24. Wayne R.P. Principles and Applications of Photochemistry. London: Oxford University Press, 1988. P. 268.
  25. 25. Сидорова Т.Н., Данилюк А.Л., Борисенко В.Е. // Доклады Национальной академии наук Беларуси. 2017. T. 61. № 6. С. 42.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library