- PII
- 10.31857/S0044457X24060149-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044457X24060149
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 69 / Issue number 6
- Pages
- 919-927
- Abstract
- The application of zinc oxide ZnO nanorods of different heights obtained by hydrothermal synthesis as functional layers for dye-sensitized solar cells has been considered. The structure, morphology, and optical properties of the nanorod layers were investigated by X-ray phase analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and optical spectroscopy. Photoanodes were fabricated using thieno[3,2-b]indole-based dyes IS 4 and IS 9. The adsorption mechanism of the dyes and ZnO structures was studied by IR spectroscopy. The efficiency of photoanodes was investigated using photoelectrochemical measurements. The dependence of the efficiency of the dye sensitized solar cells on the length of the nanorods was shown. The maximum light conversion result was obtained for a photoanode with an average nanorod height of 2.5 μm and dye adsorbed IS 4.
- Keywords
- гидротермальный синтез оксид цинка ZnO наностержни сенсибилизированные красителями солнечные элементы
- Date of publication
- 15.06.2024
- Year of publication
- 2024
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 55
References
- 1. Kumar V., Gupta R., Bansal A. // ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021. V. 4. P. 6212. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c01012
- 2. Kim K.H., Utashiro K., Abe Y., Kawamura M. // Materials. 2014. V. 7(4). P. 2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7042522
- 3. Kumar R., Umar A., Kumar G. et al. // Mater. Sci. 2017. V. 52. P. 4743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0668-z
- 4. Shah M.A. // Mod. Phys. Lett. B. 2008. V. 22. № 26. P. 2617. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984908017126
- 5. Samanta P.K., Bandyopadhyay A.K. // Appl. Nanosci. 2012. V. 2. P. 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-011-0038-8
- 6. Li X., Li R., Feng X. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68. P. 1386. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0036023623601307
- 7. Bouarroudj T., Aoudjit L., Nessaibia I. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2023. V. 97. P. 1074. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423050278
- 8. Duangnet L., Phuruangrat A., Thongtem T. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. P. 721. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622050114
- 9. Djurisic A.B., Chen X., Leung, Y.H. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2012. V. 22. P. 6526. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm15548f
- 10. Guell F., Galdamez-Martinez A., Martinez-Alanis P.R. et al. // Mater. Adv. 2023. V. 4. P. 3685. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MA00227F
- 11. Mokrushin A.S., Gorban Y.M., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. P. 2099. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622601520
- 12. Ulyankina A.A., Tsarenko A.D., Molodtsova T.A. et al. // Russ. J. Electrochem. 2023. V. 59. P. 1032. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193523120145
- 13. Grätzel M. // Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2006. V. 14. № 5. P. 429. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.712
- 14. Grifoni F., Bonomo M., Naim W. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2021. V. 11. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202101598
- 15. Ahmad W., Mehmood U., Al-Ahmed A. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2016. V. 222. P. 473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.200
- 16. Tiwana P., Docampo P., Johnston M.B. et al. // ACS Nano. 2011. V. 5. P. 5158. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn201243y
- 17. Sufyan M., Mehmood U., Qayyum Gill Y. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2021. V. 297. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130017
- 18. Qu, J., Lai C. // J. Nanomater. 2013 V. 2013. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/762730
- 19. Law M., Greene L.E., Johnson J.C. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2005. V. 4. P. 455. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1387
- 20. Marimuthu T., Anandhan N. // AIP Conf. Proc. 2015. V. 1728. P. 020621-1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4946672
- 21. Yodyingyong S., Zhang Q., Park K. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010. V. 96. № 7. P. 073115-1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3327339
- 22. Brown P., Takechi K., Kamat P.V. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008. V. 112. № 12. P. 4776. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp7107472
- 23. Bharat T.C., Shubham, Mondal S. et al. // Mater. Today: Proc. 2019. V. 11. P. 767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.041
- 24. Lin C.C., Li Y.Y. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009. V. 113. P. 334.
- 25. Gan Y.X., Jayatissa A.H., Yu Z. et al. // J. Nanomater. 2020. V. 2020. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8917013
- 26. Edalati K., Shakiba A., Vahdati-Khaki J., Zebarjad S.M. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2016. V. 74. P. 374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.11.001
- 27. Mohajerani M.S., Lak A., Simchi A. // J. Alloys Compd. 2009. V. 485. № 1–2. P. 616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.054
- 28. Steparuk A.S., Irgashev R.A., Zhilina E.F. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. – Mater. Electron. 2022. V. 33. P. 6307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07805-w
- 29. Iyengar P., Das C., Balasubramaniam K.R. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2017. V. 50. № 10. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa5875
- 30. Chowdhury M.S., Rahman K.S., Selvanathan V. et al. // RSC Advances. 2021. V. 11. № 24. P. 14534. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA00338K
- 31. Yang F., Ma S., Zhang X. et al. // Superlattices Microstruct. 2012. V. 52. № 2. P. 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2012.05.004
- 32. Jeon E.H., Yang S., Kim Y. et al. // Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015. V. 10. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1063-4
- 33. Khan A., Hussain M., Nur O. et al. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2014. V. 47. № 34. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/34/345102
- 34. Maikap A., Mukherjee K., Mondal B., Mandal N. // RSC Advances. 2016. V. 6. P. 64611. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA09598D
- 35. Laha P., Nazarkin M., Volkova A.V. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015. V. 106. P. 101904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913909
- 36. Li J.Y., Chen X.L., Li H. et al. // J. Cryst. Growth. 2001 V. 233. P. 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248 (01)01509-3
- 37. Tauc J., Scott T.A. // Phys. Today. 1967. V. 20. № 10. P. 105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3033945
- 38. Musa I., Qamhieh N., Mahmoud S.T. // Res. in Phys. 2017. V. 7. P. 3552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.09.035
- 39. Idiawati R., Mufti N., Taufiq A. et al. // IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017. V. 202. P. 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/202/1/012050
- 40. Zhang L., Cole J.M. // ACS Appl. Mater. and Interfaces. 2015. V. 7. P. 3427. https://doi.org/10.1021/am507334m
- 41. Bojarski J.T., Mokrosz J.L., Barton H.J. et al. // Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1985. V. 38. P. 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2725 (08)60921-6
