RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Potentiometraic Method for Determining Biologically Non-Degradable Antimicrobial Substances

PII
10.31857/S0044457X23601633-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X23601633
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 12
Pages
1824-1830
Abstract
Ion selective electrodes (ISEs) based on polymer plasticized membranes have been developed for the determination of benzalkonium chloride (alkyldimethylbenzylammonium), the active component being cesium bis-octodecyl-2-sulfonio-closo-decaborate Cs[B10H9S(C18H37)2] (sensor A). For the determination of norfloxacin hydrochloride, the active component is potassium tris-octodecyl-1-ammonio-closo-decaborate K[B10H9N(C18H37)3] (sensor B). It has been shown that the electrodes have a reversible potentiometric response with respect to the analyzed cations in the presence of a number of other inorganic and organic cations. The influence of the concentration of the electrode-active substance on the electrochemical characteristics of the manufactured sensor has been studied. The optimal composition of the ion-sensitive membrane has been found. It has been determined that the developed sensors provide a wide range of detectable concentrations (for sensor A, 2 × 10–7–1 × 10–2; for sensor B, 1 × 10–7–1 × 10–2) and a low detection limit (for sensor A, 1 × 10–7 M; for sensor B, 8 × 10–8 M). New ISEs can be recommended for direct potentiometric detection of free ions in water bodies and water extracts of soils.
Keywords
бензалкония хлорид норфлоксацин ионоселективный электрод полимерная мембрана <i>клозо</i>-декаборатный анион
Date of publication
01.12.2023
Year of publication
2023
Number of purchasers
0
Views
45

References

  1. 1. Zhang C., Tezel U., Li K. et al. // Water Res. 2011. V. 45. № 3. P. 1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.037
  2. 2. Barber O.W., Hartmann E.M. // Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022. V. 52. № 15. P. 2691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1889284
  3. 3. Domnina Yu.M., Suslov V.V., Kedik S.A. et al. // Drug development & registration. 2020. V. 9. № 4. P. 121. https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2020-9-4-121-127
  4. 4. Kümmerer K., Eitel A., Braun U. et al. // J. Chromatogr. A. 1997. V. 774. № 1–2. P. 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673 (97)00242-2
  5. 5. Ul’yanovskii N., Kosyakov D.S., Shavrina I. // Macc-cпeктpoмeтpия. 2022. T. 16. № 1. https://doi.org/10.25703/MS.2021.59.36.002
  6. 6. Ly N.H., Nguyen P., Son S.J. et al. // Bull. Korean. Chem. Soc. 2022. V. 43. № 2. P. 246. https://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.12441
  7. 7. Schubert S. // Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. 2014. V. 9. № 3. P. 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-014-0457-y
  8. 8. Von Ah S., Stephan R., Zurfluh K. et al. // Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2019. V. 161. № 6. P. 387. https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00211
  9. 9. Bloem E., Albihn A., Elving J. et al. // Sci. Total Environ. 2017. V. 607–608. P. 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.274
  10. 10. Domes C., Domes R., Popp J. et al. // Anal. Chem. 2017. V. 89. № 18. P. 9997. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02422
  11. 11. Ratsak C., Guhl B., Zühlke S. et al. // Environ. Sci. Eur. 2013. V. 25. № 1. P. 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-25-7
  12. 12. Abdullina S.G., Serebriannikova E.A. // Medical Pharmaceutical J. “Pulse”. 2022. P. 17. https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2022-24-6-17-22
  13. 13. Kubasov A.S., Turishev E.S., Kopytin A.V. et al. // Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2021. V. 514. P. 119992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2020.119992
  14. 14. Zdrachek E., Bakker E. // Anal. Chem. 2019. V. 91. № 1. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04681
  15. 15. Turyshev E.S., Shpigun L.K., Kopytin A.V. et al. // Austin. J. Anal. Pharm. Chem. 2023. V. 10. № 1. P. 1154. https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2023. 1154
  16. 16. Zhizhin K.Yu., Turyshev E.S., Kopytin A.V. et al. // Nanosystems: Phys. Chem. Mathem. 2022. V. 13. № 6. P. 688. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2022-13-6-688-697
  17. 17. Kubasov A.S., Turishev E.S., Golubev A.V. et al. // Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2020. V. 507. P. 119589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2020.119589
  18. 18. Nelyubin A.V., Klyukin I.N., Novikov A.S. et al. // Inorganics (Basel). 2022. V. 10. № 11. P. 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10110196
  19. 19. Kubasov A.S., Turishev E.S., Golubev A.V. et al. // Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2020. V. 507. P. 119589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2020.119589
  20. 20. Nelyubin A.V., Selivanov N.A., Bykov A.Yu. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 11. P. 1776. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622601106
  21. 21. Turyshev E.S., Kopytin A.V., Zhizhin K.Y. et al. // Talanta. 2022. V. 241. P. 123239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123239
  22. 22. Kopytin A., Turyshev E., Madraimov M. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68. № 1. P. 10.
  23. 23. Schaller U., Bakker E., Pretsch E. // Anal. Chem. 1995. V. 67. № 18. P. 3123. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00114a005
  24. 24. Buck R.P., Lindner E. // Pure Appl. Chem. 1994. V. 66. № 12. P. 2527. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199466122527
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library