RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Study of Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Properties of Borylated Iminols [BnHn – 1NHC(OH)R]– (n = 10, 12)

PII
10.31857/S0044457X23600895-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X23600895
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 10
Pages
1373-1378
Abstract
The behavior of borylated iminols based on the closo-decaborate and closo-dodecaborate anions in the dichloromethane–water system has been studied as a function of the pH of the aqueous phase. The distribution coefficients of compounds in the n-octanol–water system have been determined: for (Bu4N)[B12H11NHC(OH)CH3], log Kow = –0.46; for (Bu4N)[2-B10H9NHC(OH)CH3], log Kow = –0.51. These compounds show hydrophilic properties similar to those of formic and acetic acids. It has been shown that this method can be used to purify target compounds from hydrolysis products in the preparation of various derivatives as a result of nucleophilic addition of the closo-borate anions to nitrilium derivatives.
Keywords
<i>клозо</i>-додекаборатный анион <i>клозо</i>-декаборатный анион нитрилиевые производные иминолы ВЭЖХ
Date of publication
01.10.2023
Year of publication
2023
Number of purchasers
0
Views
38

References

  1. 1. Zhang Y., Liu J., Duttwyler S. // Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015. V. 2015. № 31. P. 5158. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201501009
  2. 2. Messina M.S., Axtell J.C., Wang Y. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016. V. 138. № 22. P. 6952. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b03568
  3. 3. Bolli C., Derendorf J., Jenne C. et al. // Chem. Eur. J. 2014. V. 20. № 42. P. 13783. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201403625
  4. 4. Grüner B., Bonnetot B., Mongeot H. // Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1997. V. 62. № 8. P. 1185. https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc19971185
  5. 5. Sivaev I.B., Bregadze V.I., Sjöberg S. // Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2002. V. 67. № 6. P. 679. https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc20020679
  6. 6. Nelyubin A.V., Klyukin I.N., Novikov A.S. et al. // Inorganics. 2022. V. 10. № 11. P. 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10110196
  7. 7. Bogdanova E.V., Stogniy M.Yu., Suponitsky K.Yu. et al. // Molecules. 2021. V. 26. № 21. P. 6544. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216544
  8. 8. Laskova J., Ananiev I., Kosenko I. et al. // Dalton Trans. 2022. V. 51. № 8. P. 3051. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1DT04174F
  9. 9. Nelyubin A.V., Selivanov N.A., Bykov A.Yu. et al. // Int. J. Molecular Sci. 2021. V. 22. № 24. P. 13391. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413391
  10. 10. Losytskyy M.Yu., Kovalska V.B., Varzatskii O.A. et al. // J. Lumin. 2016. V. 169. P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.08.042
  11. 11. Kimura S., Masunaga S., Harada T. et al. // Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011. V. 19. № 5. P. 1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.01.020
  12. 12. Fedotova M.K., Usachev M.N., Bogdanova E.V. et al. // Bioengineering. 2021. V. 9. № 1. P. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010005
  13. 13. Zhang Y., Sun Y., Wang T. et al. // Molecules. 2018. V. 23. № 12. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23123137
  14. 14. Varkhedkar R., Yang F., Dontha R. et al. // ACS Central Sci. 2022. V. 8. № 3. P. 322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c01132
  15. 15. Sun Y., Zhang J., Zhang Y. et al. // Chem. Eur. J. 2018. V. 24. № 41. P. 10364. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201801602
  16. 16. Nelyubin A.V., Sokolov M.S., Selivanov N.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 11. P. 1751. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362260109X
  17. 17. Nelyubin A.V., Selivanov N.A., Bykov A.Yu. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 11. P. 1776. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622601106
  18. 18. Nelyubin A.V., Klyukin I.N., Novikov A.S. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2021. V. 31. № 2. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2021.03.018
  19. 19. Zhdanov A.P., Klyukin I.N., Bykov A.Y. et al. // Polyhedron. 2017. V. 123. P. 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2016.11.035
  20. 20. Nelyubin A.V., Klyukin I.N., Zhdanov A.P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019. V. 64. № 14. P. 1750. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023619140043
  21. 21. Šícha V., Plešek J., Kvíčalová M. et al. // Dalton Trans. 2009. № 5. P. 851. https://doi.org/10.1039/B814941K
  22. 22. Stogniy M.Y., Erokhina S.A., Sivaev I.B. et al. // Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2019. V. 194. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426507.2019.1631312
  23. 23. Guangxian X., Jimei X., Technolgy S. // New Frontiers in Rare Earth Science and Applications. 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-11730-8
  24. 24. Нелюбин А.В., Клюкин И.Н., Селиванов Н.А. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 6. С. 768. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22602310
  25. 25. Yang S.T., White S.A., Hsu S.T. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991. V. 30. № 6. P. 1335. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00054a040
  26. 26. Dupont-Leclercq L., Giroux S., Henry B. et al. // Langmuir. 2007. V. 23. № 21. P. 10463. https://doi.org/10.1021/la7017488
  27. 27. Fu H., Sun Y., Teng H. et al. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015. V. 139. P. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.11.001
  28. 28. Zhdanov A.P., Bykov A.Y., Kubasov A.S. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017. V. 62. № 4. P. 468. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023617040210
  29. 29. Dearden J.C., Bresnen G.M. // Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. 1988. V. 7. № 3. P. 133. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.19880070304
  30. 30. Grüner B., Plzák Z. // J. Chromatogr. A. 1997. V. 789. № 1–2. P. 497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673 (97)00497-4
  31. 31. Horáček O., Papajová-Janetková M., Grüner B. et al. // Talanta. 2021. V. 222. P. 121652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121652
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library