Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал неорганической химии Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-457X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-560X

Preparation and Reduction of Graphene Oxide/Zinc Borate Composites as Candidate Flame-Retardant Materials

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044457X2360007X-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044457X2360007X
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
A. S. Ivannikova
  • Affiliation: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 6
Pages
857-864
Abstract
A new method for manufacturing composites comprising graphene oxide (GO) and zinc borate nanopowders is described. The method comprises ultrasonic stirring of precursor slurries followed by removal of water. Exposure to supercritical isopropanol provides a composite comprising reduced graphene oxide (RGO) and zinc borate nanopowder due to removal of oxygen functions from the graphene oxide structure, thereby providing a uniform distribution of zinc borate particles over the surface of reduced graphene oxide.
Keywords
оксид графена восстановленный оксид графена борат цинка композиционный материал антипирен сверхкритический изопропанол
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
14

References

  1. 1. Wang H., Yin P. // Case. Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023. V. 18. P. e01748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01748
  2. 2. Dong J., Li G., Gao J. et al. // Sci. Total. Environ. 2022. V. 848. P. 157695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157695
  3. 3. Ling S., Lu C., Fu M. et al. // J. Clean. Prod. 2022. V. 373. P. 133970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133970
  4. 4. Chai K., Xu S. // Adv. Powder. Technol. 2022. V. 33. P. 103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2022.103776
  5. 5. Pan J., Wu M., Chu H. et al. // Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2022. V. 307. P. 2200259. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202200259
  6. 6. Zhang C., He H., Li Q. et al. // Polym. Int. V. 71. P. 1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.6399
  7. 7. Miao Z., Yan D., Wang X. et al. // Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021. V. 33. P. 4026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.003
  8. 8. Ozyhar T., Tschannen C., Thoemen H. et al. // Fire. And. Materials. 2022. V. 46. P. 595. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.3009
  9. 9. Tong C., Zhang S., Zhong T. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2021. V. 413. P. 129440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129440
  10. 10. Yang K., Li X. // Holzforschung. 2019. V. 73. P. 599. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2018-0167
  11. 11. M. Zia-ul-Mustafa, Faiz A., Sami U. et al. // Prog. Org. Coat. 2017. V. 102. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.014
  12. 12. Guo L., Lv Z., Zhu T. et al. // Sci. Total. Environ. 2023. V. 858. P. 159746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159746
  13. 13. Xu Z., Zhan J., Xu Z. et al. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. P. 8783. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248783
  14. 14. Liu J., Zeng L., Ai L. et al. // Vinyl. Addit. Technol. 2022. V. 28. P. 591. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.21909
  15. 15. Xu Y., Zhou R., Mu J. et al. // Colloids. Surf. A. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022. V. 640. P. 128400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128400
  16. 16. Atay H.Y., Celik E. // Polym. Compos. 2016. V. 24. P. 419. https://doi.org/10.1177/096739111602400605
  17. 17. Li Y., Hao Z., Cao H. et al. // Opt Laser Technol. 2023. V. 160. P. 109054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.109054
  18. 18. Tu M., Jia L., Kong X. et al. // J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2023. V. 635. P. 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.12.126
  19. 19. Sahoo S., Bhuyan M., Sahoo D. // J. Alloys Compd. 2023. V. 935. P. 168097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168097
  20. 20. Ma Q., Liu M., Cui F. et al. // Carbon. 2023. V. 204. P. 336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.066
  21. 21. Li J., Wu W., Duan R. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023. V. 611. P. 155736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155736
  22. 22. Chen O., Liu L., Zhang A. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2023. V. 454. P. 140424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140424
  23. 23. Zheng H., Liu H., Duan H. // Mater. Lett. 2023. V. 330. P. 133351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133351
  24. 24. Yang F., Zhao H., Wang Y. et al. // Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022. V. 648. P. 129326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129326
  25. 25. Chua C.K., Pumera M. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014. V. 43. P. 291. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60303B
  26. 26. Agarwal V., Per B. Zetterlund. // Chem. Eng. J. 2021. V. 405. P. 127018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127018
  27. 27. Koreshkova A.N., Gupta V., Peristyy A. et al. // Talanta. 2019. V. 205. P. 120081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.06.081
  28. 28. Sang B., Li Zw., Li Xh. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2016. V. 51. P. 8271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0124-0
  29. 29. Qian X., Song L., Yu B. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013. V. 1. P. 6822. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA10416H
  30. 30. Pishch I.V., Rotman T.I., Romanenko Z.A. et al. // Glass. Ceram. 1987. V. 44. P.174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00701660
  31. 31. Rajpoot Y., Sharma V., Basak S. et al. // J. Nat. Fibers. 2022. V. 19. P. 5663. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.1889431
  32. 32. Liu Z., Li Z., Zhao X. et al. // Polymers. 2018. V. 10. P. 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10060625
  33. 33. Kozerozhets I.V., Avdeeva V.V., Buzanov G.A. et al. // Inorganics. 2022. V. 10. P. 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10110212
  34. 34. Zhang Z., Wu W., Zhang M. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017. V. 425. P. 896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.101
  35. 35. Zuo L., Fan W., Zhang Y. et al. // Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017. V. 139. P. 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.008
  36. 36. Leng Q., Li J., Wang Y. // New J. Chem. 2020. V. 44. P. 4568. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ06253J
  37. 37. Ioni Y.V., Chentsov S.I., Sapkov I.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. P. 1711. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622601076
  38. 38. Yu P., Wang H., Bao R. et al. // ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017. V. 5. P. 1557. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02254
  39. 39. Eigler S., Dotzer C., Hof F. et al. // Chem. Eur. J. 2013. V. 19. P. 9490. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201300387
  40. 40. Aliyev E., Filiz V., Khan M.M. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2019. V. 9. P. 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9081180
  41. 41. Zheng Y., Qu Y., Tian Y. et al. // Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009. V. 349. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.07.039
  42. 42. López-Díaz D., López Holgado M., García-Fierro J. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. 2017. V. 121. P. 20489. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06236
  43. 43. Perumbilavil S., Sankar P., T. Priya Rose T.P. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015. V. 107. P. 051104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928124
  44. 44. Farah S., Farkas A., Madarász J. et al. // J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2020. V. 142. P. 331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09719-3
  45. 45. Liu C., Wu W., Shi Y. et al. // Compos. B. Eng. 2020. V. 203. P. 108486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108486
  46. 46. Ioni Y.V., Groshkova Y.A., Buslaeva E.Y. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. P. 950. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621060115
  47. 47. Tkachev S.V., Buslaeva E.Y., Naumkin A.V. et al. // J. Inorg. Mater. 2012. V. 48. P. 796. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168512080158
  48. 48. Ioni Y.V., Kraevsky S.V., Groshkova Y.A. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2021. V. 35. P. 718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2021.09.042
  49. 49. Ioni Y.V., Voronov V.V., Naumkin A.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015. V. 60. P. 709. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023615060066
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library