- PII
- 10.31857/S0044457X22600633-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044457X22600633
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 68 / Issue number 1
- Pages
- 56-66
- Abstract
- The dependence of the stability of Mn(C5H7O2)3 modifications on the properties of the solvent chosen for recrystallization is considered. Low-polarity solvents with a low dielectric permittivity enhance intermolecular interactions, which leads to the formation of the β-Mn(C5H7O2)3 modification during the synthesis of Mn(C5H7O2)3 from chloroform solutions. The use of mixtures of chloroform with petroleum ether makes it possible to control supersaturation, the rate of formation, and growth of phase nuclei due to the evaporation of chloroform under isothermal conditions. The use of polar solvents for recrystallization favors the formation of γ-Mn(C5H7O2)3. The composition of the thermal decomposition products of β‑Mn(C5H7O2)3 in a dry inert atmosphere has been determined by X-ray powder diffraction, IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric and mass spectral analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. In the temperature range 140–240°C, β-Mn(C5H7O2)3 melts to form Mn(C5H7O2)2. At temperatures of 500–550°С, Mn(C5H7O2)2 decomposes to a mixture of MnO, Mn3O4, Mn2O3, and carbon.
- Keywords
- ацетилацетонат марганца(III) термолиз разложение термический анализ кристаллическая структура ИК-спектроскопия термогравиметрия масс-спектральный анализ
- Date of publication
- 17.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 11
References
- 1. Snider B.B. // Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2001. https://doi.org/ /10.1002/047084289X.rm022
- 2. Ban H.T., Kase T., Murata M. // J. Polym. Sci. A1. 2001. V. 39. № 21. P. 3733. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.10021
- 3. Gorkum R., Bouwman E., Reedijk J. // Inorg. Chem. 2004. V. 43. № 8. P. 2456. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0354217
- 4. Sleightholme A.E.S., Shinkle A.A., Liu Q. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2011. V. 196. № 13. P. 5742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.020
- 5. Park Y.J., Kim J.G., Kim M.K. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2000. V. 130. № 3. P. 203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738 (00)-00551-8
- 6. Fackler J.P., Avdeef A. // Inorg. Chem. 1974. V. 13. № 8. P. 1864. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50138a016
- 7. Stults B.R., Marianelli R.S., Day V.W. // Inorg. Chem. 1979. V. 18. № 7. P. 1853. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50197a028
- 8. Geremia S., Demitri N. // J. Chem. Educ. 2005. V. 82. № 3. P. 460. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p460
- 9. Arslan E., Lalancette R.A., Bernal I. // Struct. Chem. 2017. V. 28. № 1. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-016-0864-0
- 10. Bhattacharjee M.N., Chaudhuri M.K., Khathing D.T. // J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982. № 3. P. 669. https://doi.org/10.1039/DT9820000669
- 11. Kunstle G. Patent FRG. №2420775 A1. 1974
- 12. Charles R.G., Bryant B.E. // Inorg. Synth. 1963. P. 183. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470132388.ch49
- 13. Cartledge G.H. Patent USA № 2556316. 1951.
- 14. Linke W., Zirker G. Pat FRG № 1039056B. 1957.
- 15. Gach F. // C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. IIc: Chim. 1900. P. 98.
- 16. Грачев В.И., Носков С.В., Филатов И.Ю. Пат. РФ № 2277529C1 // Бюлл. 16 от 10.06.2006.
- 17. Matthews J.C., Wood L.L. Pat. USA № 474464. 1969.
- 18. Siddiqi M.A., Siddiqui R.A., Atakan B. // Surf Coat. Tech. 2007. V. 201. № 22. P. 9055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.04.036
- 19. McNeill I.C., Liggat J.J. // Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 1992. V. 37. № 1. P. 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910 (92)90088-M
- 20. Babich I.V., Davydenko L.A., Sharanda L.F. et al. // Thermochim. Acta. 2007. V. 456. № 2. P. 145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2007.02.010
- 21. Reichert C., Bancroft G.M., Westmore J.B. // Can. J. Chem. 1970. V. 48. № 9. P. 1362. https://doi.org/10.1139/v70-225
- 22. Macdonald C.G., Shannon J.S. // Aust. J. Chem. 1966. V. 19. № 9. P. 1545. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9661545
- 23. Новый справочник химика и технолога / Под ред. Москвина А.В. СПб., 2006. 456 с.
- 24. Zlomanov V.P., Eshmakov R.S., Prolubshchikov I.V. // Condensed Matter and Interphases. 2022. V. 24. № 1. P. 29. [Зломанов В.П., Эшмаков Р.С., Пролубщи-ков И.В. // Конденсированные среды и межфазные границы. 2022. Т. 24. № 1. С. 29.] https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2022.24/000
- 25. Тарасевич Б.Н. // ИК-спектры основных классов органических соединений. Справочные материалы. М., 2012. 55 с.
- 26. Diaz-Acosta I., Baker J., Hinton J.F. et al. // Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2003. V. 59. № 2. P. 363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425 (02)00166-X
- 27. Lawson K.E. // Spectrochim. Acta. 1961. V. 17. № 3. P. 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0371-1951 (61)80071-4
- 28. Pinchas S., Silver B.L., Laulicht I. // J. Chem. Phys. 1967. V. 46. № 4. P. 1506. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1840881
- 29. Алиханян А.С., Малкерова И.П., Севастьянов В.Г. и др. // Высокочистые вещества. 1987. Т. 3. С. 112.
- 30. Semyannikov P.P., Igumenov I.K., Trubin S.V., Asanov I.P. // J. Phys. IV. France. 2001. V. 11. P. 995.
- 31. Jarosch D. // Miner. Petrol. 1987. V. 37. № 1. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01163155
- 32. Hase W. // Phys. Status Solidi B. 1963. V. 3. № 12. P. K446. https://doi.org//10.1002/pssb.19630031225
- 33. Jay A.H., Andrews K.W. // J. Iron Steel I. 1945. V. 152. № 2. P. 15.
- 34. Hassel O., Mark H. // Z. Phys. 1924. V. 25. № 1. P. 317.
- 35. Shibata S., Onuma S., Inoue H. // Inorg. Chem. 1985. V. 24. № 11. P. 1723. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00205a028
- 36. Tran M. van, Ha A.T., Le P.M.L. // J. Nanomater. 2015. V. 16. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/609273
- 37. Lemmon E.W., McLinden M.O., Friend D.G. et al. // National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg, 2011.
- 38. Wu Z., Yu K., Huang Y. et al. // Chem. Cent. J. 2007. V. 1. № 1. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-1-8
- 39. Sharrouf M., Awad R., Roumié M. et al. // Mater. Sci. Appl. 2015. V. 6. № 10. P. 850.
- 40. Zheng M., Zhang H., Gong X. et al. // Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013. V. 8. № 1. P. 166. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-16
